Moon landing was def fake. Too many factors but the fact no other country has landed there just doesn't sit well. Not to mention multiple light sources and shadows in different directions.
Printable View
Moon landing was def fake. Too many factors but the fact no other country has landed there just doesn't sit well. Not to mention multiple light sources and shadows in different directions.
Michael, if you look at that footage I posted of the lunar lander "blasting off" and you don't think that's fake as fuck, then you believe what you want to believe rather than what should be obvious to the naked eye.
I'm def no scientist but everything just seemed to convenient. The cold war and the space race... it's like America needed hope and a hero. Why not fake it?
Wikipedia is extremely liberal. I also have a degree in the sciences and am one semester away from finishing my second degree. I do have access to journals, I was asking how you access them. I have taken geology and three chemistry courses.
It is easy enough to claim that something is incorrect, harder to demonstrate it.
I suppose we can have different ideas about what “common” and “significant” mean. It absolutely does not mean that more petroleum was abotically produced, and you know this.
Can you give an example? I know that there are some rare strata that have migrated upward or downward. It seem you are defining where organic deposits are found, according to the notion that they cannot migrate.
That does not seem to be the case.
You have oversimplified the issue to the point of dishonesty. You can assure me but the fact is that oil companies operate under the idea that petroleum is biologically produced.
Are we talking about the process that produce the overwhelming majority of petroleum hydrocarbons in earths mantel, on thermodynamic grounds, or are we talking about methane on other planets. You must know the differences.
Finally for a glimpse into the history of the subject, start here:
http://static.scribd.com/docs/j79lhbgbjbqrb.pdf
Here is an NPR discussion of the subject. Must be a pretty fringe theory to get airtime on NPR.
http://web.archive.org/web/201110251...Kenney-NPR.mp3
Interesting the guest is a guy who owns a company in the US that tells oil companies where to drill. So much for your theory about how US oil companies work.
There's no reason for you to make that incorrect assumtion. I read abstracts on both sides but it is difficult to find anything current supporting your view. You seem to be the one claiming to know everything on the topic. I dont have a point to make here, Im simply offering an opportunity for you to support your assertion.
I dont claim to know the answer to this definitively, as you do. Skepticism should be applied to both sides of any issue. I think this paper is interesting and Im digesting it.
http://www.pnas.org/content/99/17/10976.full
Enjoy your red pill.