Lloyd Irvin Students *allegedly* rape caught on camera

Sorry if this is a repost, or innappropriate. Thought I'd share. Here is the link:

http://www.mixedmartialarts.com/mma....2&page=1&pc=13

http://bcove.me/o1uivhk7

Matthew Maldanado, 26, and Nicholas Schultz, 21, are accused of repeatedly raping a 20-year-old Fairfax woman as she fell in and out of consciousness in the parking garage of St. Matthews Cathedral on New Year's Eve.

According to court documents, the young woman, Maldanado and Schultz all know each other from the Lloyd Irvin Martial Arts School in Camps Springs where they trained.

Police said the woman bumped in the two men at a club in D.C. They offered to escort her to an instructor's home, because she was too drunk to drive.

But the men took her to the St. Matthew's Center parking garage instead, police explained, where surveillance cameras captured Maldanado raping the woman and Shultz joining.

After Maldanado left, police said, the tape shows Schultz raping her repeatedly. She told police he said at one point, "I am sorry. I am a sick bastard."

A roommate in the Clinton home where both men live said he was out of town when the alleged rape occurred.

"I have no idea. I know nothing," he added

Schultz told the court after he was arrested that he lives in a Jiu Jitsu fighter house.

"What I know is they have always been real nice to me, really good friend. I like them a lot," the roommate said.

Neighbors said police had the area blocked off the night Maldanado and Schultz were arrested.

"Swat team, riot van, one man in riot gear...," one neighbor said. "Well, I'm glad they caught then...," another neighbor added.

Detectives said the woman claimed she had been raped, but it wasn't until they saw the tape, that the extent of the allegations emerged.

They wrote of the alleged attack "She fell backwards...striking her head against the wall...later struck her head again...and noted she collapsed to the ground...several times...he head again hitting the ground."

At the end of the report, the police said the two suspects left the victim on the concrete. A passerby later heard her cries for help.

Maldanado and Schultz will appear in court Thursday.

Here is the link to the news article: http://www.wjla.com/articles/2013/01...#ixzz2HW6hBbeZ

Can you edit the title? They didn't film the rape. The security cameras caught it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by David Rosado

Can you edit the title? They didn't film the rape. The security cameras caught it.

---

crap I can't. I need to renew my membership...haven't been on in awhile. Hopefully a mod can fix it...my bad

well this is terrible. although it has nothing to do with Lloyd Irvin himself, i hate that his name is getting dragged into something like this.

Damn thats fucked up. she couldn't even trust dudes from her own school. the last thing you ever want to do is allow potential rapist through your doors and teach those fucks jiujitsu. most dudes take a natural protective role over there female teamates especially if you see them too drunk in a club. and Lloyd is such a good dude & goes way out of his way to help his students and they play him out like that. & isn't this the same shultz that put cobrinhas techniques on dvd behind his back and sold that shit ? then left Jacaraes. i wish those fucks could get 20 plus years like you would for a non violent drug offense and whats the bigger crime.

my bad not the same shultz

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by derrick ikwueme

my bad not the same shultz

---

nice

Crazy. Was just reading Lloyd Irvin himself was allegedly involved in something similar years ago too. That has been brought up because of this.

Was posted of fb by an ex-TUF contestant (Frankie Lester) - http://articles.dailypress.com/1990-...or-irvin-trial

e2a the text as link is temperamental


April 25, 1990|By JIM SPENCER Columnist
I'm glad I wasn't on the jury that had to decide whether Terrence Gatling and Lloyd Irvin Jr. were guilty of gang-raping a 17-year-old Hampton University freshman.

Although the jurors found Gatling guilty of forcible sodomy, there was not enough evidence to convict either man of rape.

Still, when the three-day rape trial ended Monday, the defendants had revealed too much about themselves to be let off the hook for what happened Oct. 7 in Gatling's apartment.

On that evening a 17-year-old girl agreed to go to dinner with a group of male college students she barely knew. Then she agreed to go to an apartment with them for a party. Somewhere along the line she drank some booze.

By the end of the night, at least seven men had had sex with her. Neither Gatling, who is 21, nor Irvin, who is 20, tried to talk any of them out of it. Instead, they joined in. Or tried.

Irvin was saved by the fact that the jury believed he was impotent when it was his turn.

The rape trial was argued on the same turf as most rape trials: The girl, 5 feet 2 inches tall and 98 pounds, said she was forced to submit to the men's sexual advances. She said when she struggled with one of them, he hit her in the mouth. A medical report showed that her mouth was bruised.

The men said she was a willing participant in an orgy. Lawyers for Irvin and Gatling called witnesses who claimed they heard the girl encourage the men having sex with her.

The defendants also claimed that one of the first men to have sex with her came out of the bedroom yelling, "She's a freak. She's a freak."

Irvin and Gatling apparently took that to mean the 17-year-old was a nymphomaniac.

My question is: What difference does that make?

Does it justify being the seventh guy into the bedroom, or, for that matter, the first?

The jury didn't really address that.

"It was an emotional trial," one of the jurors, Barry Spigel, told me. "But we did a good job of getting rid of our own separate emotions and considering the evidence. The jury felt that there was reasonable doubt of whether a rape had occurred."

"I feel the girl was raped," said Bessie Singleton, another juror. "But the room where this happened was dark, and with all that was going on, it was unclear who was doing what."

"It's not over in my mind," Paul Hoyt, a third juror, confided. "These kinds of trials never are. You hope you call it correctly. I don't know what else you can do. We prayed to God for some guidance. I don't think anybody got any great revelations."

Without divine intervention, the trial turned on legal definitions. That's the only fair way, I know, but in this case it doesn't seem like enough.

Irvin walked free, not because he did the right thing and refused to have sex with a 17-year-old. He testified that he wanted to have intercourse with her but couldn't.


Gatling's rape charge stemmed from an accusation that he held the girl down while Irvin had intercourse with her. Since the jury believed Irvin didn't have intercourse, Gatling couldn't have helped him. So Gatling could be convicted only of forcing the 17-year-old to perform oral sex.

Ah, justice.

I accept the premise of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. I understand that the girl used terrible judgment. But whether or not she consented to the sex acts that occurred as a result, they shouldn't have happened. What's more, there's no way for the men involved to blame somebody else.

The verdict took into consideration reasonable doubt. I just wish there was some way it could have also included moral outrage. Maybe then everyone could have learned the real lesson of this tragedy:

Decent people don't try to exploit others. Not even "freaks."

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sam Sales

Crazy. Was just reading Lloyd Irvin himself was allegedly involved in something similar years ago too. That has been brought up because of this.

Was posted of fb by an ex-TUF contestant (Frankie Lester) - http://articles.dailypress.com/1990-...or-irvin-trial

---

Is that the same Frankie Lester that trains at Team Quest....

Man thats not a good look for a guy that all about marketing... bummer.