I've always thought feminine women make the best pure jiu-jitsuists because they are generally more receptive due to the nature, do you find this true? And what do the women of the forum feel about this.
I've always thought feminine women make the best pure jiu-jitsuists because they are generally more receptive due to the nature, do you find this true? And what do the women of the forum feel about this.
uh no. But i'm not allowed to answer. so fukit.
I just thought the higher belts would have a better view of things, but I'm sure even someone who doesn't train can give some insight, please answer, I'd appreciate it.Quote:
Originally Posted by bobby rivers
i think they are technically superior for the most point but i am lazy and like to find the most effective way to do movements also.
?????
A lost by another name is still a guy named lost.
So what you're saying is having a receptive attitude makes a better BJJ player? Being open to new techniques and ideas has little to due with gender. It's a matter of perception. A better argument would be that, with less muscle tissue they are forced to be more technical. However technique is achieved through repetition, which again has to do with the person.Quote:
Originally Posted by Harry Balzac
thisQuote:
Originally Posted by stlnl
I don't. But that's just my experience.Quote:
Originally Posted by Harry Balzac
For me it's about the balance of soft and hard, yin and yang -- exemplary traits of both the male and the female,
i thought he was talking about being smaller and not about being a womenQuote:
Originally Posted by Griffin Lambert