Who do u guys think should have won that fight?
Printable View
Who do u guys think should have won that fight?
gray definitely, the judges seem to have forgotten that something they are meant to judge on is octagon control, and gray had the centre nearly the entire fight, and was pushing forwards more of the time than frankie. they have to have a rematch or its just retarded :/
I had it as a 47-47 draw.
R1 Maynard 10-8
R2 Edgar 10-9
R3 Maynard 10-9
R4 Edgar 10-9
R5 Edgar 10-9
I'm with Chris, if not a draw I think Edgar got the better off the last 4 rounds. Control doesnt have anything to do with gettting hit in the face 7 times for each punch you throw
you got to take the strap from the champion Gray dominated the 1st but the rest of the fight was very even I lean towards Frankie he stuffed Grays takedowns and was more fluid with his strikes no doubt tho there needs to be a rematch sucks for Pettis
I scored it 10-7 Maynard, 10-9 Edgar, 10-9 Maynard, 10-9 Edgar, 10-9 Edgar... 46 Edgar 47 Maynard.
A 10-7 score is extremely rare so I can accept a 47-47 draw, def not 48-46 Edgar as one judge scored it. Props to Frank Edgar for coming back like he did.
I had the last round scored 10-10 and and the first 10-8 giving gray the nod. A draw sucks more then a controversial decision imo, theres no winner at all.
I was thinking R1 should have been a 10-7 as well, but I knew the judges wouldn't give more than a 10-8.Quote:
Originally Posted by Orlando Rosæ
They should have done like the ultimate fighter show where in case of a tie for the title match there is 1 more round.
the thing i dont like about a 10-7 is that if u get that then he pretty much has to win every other round in order to win the fight. and if u think about it 1 round vs 4 is just not right.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Herzog