https://youtu.be/wbjYoINw5oI
Thoughts?
Printable View
https://youtu.be/wbjYoINw5oI
Thoughts?
Man if you actually believe 9/11 was caused by anything other than a controlled demolition you are seriously retarded.
The moron in that video tried to use an open container of non-industrial grade thermite to try and "melt" the object it was sitting on. How idiotic. Thermite has more thermal energy per weight than TnT does. If you put it in a closed container you bet your ass it's going to explode. Demolitions are done by explosives charges placed on structurally weakened support beams. Of course it has the explosive power to cause a controlled demolition. What an idiotic video.
You can't debunk 9/11 cause the evidence speaks for it self. It is empirical, it too is also understandable if your fellow man does not view it as a farce, psychologically speaking the nature of the event affects the perceptive schema- the observers world view is challenged and in moments of terror, questions will be answered and memory gaps will be filled plausibly through abstraction by the observer.Human perception occurs by a complex, unconscious process called abstraction, in which certain details of the incoming sense data are noticed and remembered, and the rest forgotten. What is kept and what is thrown away depends on an internal model or representation of the world, called by psychologists a*schema, that is built up over our entire lives. The data is fitted into this schema. Later when events are remembered, memory gaps may even be filled by "plausible" data the mind makes up to fit the model; this is called*reconstructive memory. How much attention the various perceived data are given depends on an internal value system, which judges how important it is to the individual. Thus two people can view the same event and come away with entirely different perceptions of it, even disagreeing about simple facts.
Just a little bit of understanding of structural engineering will tell you that the only way building 7 came down like that was a simultaneous catastrophic failure of all 80 support columns. Any localized explosion could not do that. There is only 1 thing that can do that, the intentional destruction of the support system for the building using controlled demolition.
Ya'll do not disappoint.
Neither do you ;)
At least I dispelled the absurd notion of trying to "burn" through steel with Thermite that the video maker tried to plant in your oh-so-fertile mind..Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael J Hewson
:) Keep it classy guys.
I completely agree with this... Please don't be rude anymore so I can continue disagreeing with Michael ;) In all seriousness though I don't think it does your point justice to insult anyone or get "heated". It would take a more intelligent person in my opinion to understand that insulting the ego of someone pretty much dries up that mental fertility. I'm not saying it is, but, it is merited to consider that maybe it's not his reception but your delivery. How am I supposed to tell what I'm watching if it's just bright light and loud noise?Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael J Hewson
9/11 the house of mossadi Arabia. See what I did there ;) Zionist control grab. Please note that I said Zionist not ANY ethnicity. Most Zionists are white but yet I'm sure I will hear anti-some-ite for just saying the word. When I was in church we used to sing a song called marching to Zion... So don't tell me it's a conspiracy. Any time a religion is changed or belief structure is changed it is in my opinion usually a usurpation of power. It happened in many great cultural changes. Even Ptolemy had a story invented so they would accept him as a God/man to be Pharaoh.
"rude"- are you serious, or just slow? Did you not see the insults Hewson launched at myself and everyone else in the nazi sympathizer thread? And now you are siding with him? Holy crap.Quote:
Originally Posted by Humanfit
I was only saying that your never going to get through to him in my opinion so being brash will only put obstacles for some people just listening with no benefit. Be as rude as you want friend! :) I'm neither God nor manager here in this dream, I was just trying to contribute to your game.
Please re read the "rude" comment again. I had hoped the Segway "in all seriousness" would have lit up the fact it was a joke like a neon light. Eat a snickers bruh;)
Alright, sorry if I overreacted but I am being attacked all day long in places like Reddit and forums where people really get off on launching nasty insults to anyone who tries to spread the truth. Recently fighting about the Apollo 11 hoax where I even showed direct video evidence that they faked the shot of earth at 130,000 miles away and were actually in low orbit, and the person just attacked me along with his goons.
It gets really tiring and after a while. The people on this planet don't want truth, they want to viciously attack anyone who tries to speak it. I long since gave up trying to convince anyone it's mostly a war of logic and evidence and refusing to be abused by sheeple.
I hear ya, its trigger mania 2017 out there. I am not mad for one second at ya so ya know.
For those who commented in this thread what do you feel caused the destruction of the towers? Progressive collapse? Controlled demolition? Also what brought you to that conclusion?
http://youtu.be/n3xgjxJwedAQuote:
Originally Posted by SamSmith
I feel like part of the distraction is "how did they do it". What about the "why" and the "who". Don't forget all out current technology is decade(s) old outdated military tech. and technology increases exponentially. Not to mention the stuff tech they would be stupid to tell us about.
Establishing what happened first is the proper way to solving a crime how can you charge someone with a crime without defining exactly what happened, then how it happened and then who did it jumping to who before you establish the what and how will lead to bias in data collection. There are many anomalies that occured that day and all evidence should be taken into account, the how shouldn't be a distraction if anything establishing the how will give you a better understanding of who could be capable of executing such a crime. I dont think our technology is outdated if anything is been growing as you point out exponentially and will continue to do so, perhaps there are technologies most are unaware of.
Ok, I see what you mean. What really got me suspish was mainly that two skyscrapers with different structural damage went down like a well oiled demolition, not to leave out tower 7. They announced it going down before it did... Another thing is the pentagon. It is damged on the inner second layer and outer first but inner first layer of the building is in tact. Is that better. Like "what tipped me off" kinda thing? Also, what I meant was civilian technology is outdated compared to the military. They wouldn't be very intelligent to just let it all out there.
I think it was a combo of cruise missles, building demolition, and cgi planes on tv.
As far as what actually destroyed the towers...what if I told you it was a bioweapon that has visual qualities which resemble trademarks of other known technologies (smoke/molten like substance / appearance) even down to the dust particles it produces the same signature as the popular thermitic material(iron oxide/sulfur).
I've heard that, maybe tesla type frequency weapon also. As far as what caused the destruction is definately a deep rabbit hole. I definately noticed the lack of debris and hole in the ground... Also it does almost appear to disintegrate.
Directed energy weapon/bioweapon the microwave/radio waves would of acted more as a signal for the bioweapon to upregulate its expressive genes. The rabbit hole is indeed deep, I recall the anthrax attack right after 9/11 (september 18th-october 9th 2001)was traced back to United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID), Fort Detrick, Maryland. The U.S Army’s main institution and facility for defensive research into countermeasures against biological warfare...curious.
Alan Wesker did 9/11Quote:
Originally Posted by SamSmith
Wait so there were no people on the planes? This is another instance of "The denial of life" that I find upsetting. You can not just flippantly say that human beings did not exist. Unless that is not what you are saying and in that case I jumped to a conclusion.Quote:
Originally Posted by Humanfit
So you believe it was a bioweapon that destroyed the towers? Just a bioweapon, or was it that and holograms, and nanothermite, and cruse missiles? Unlikely.Quote:
Originally Posted by SamSmith
Most likely what happened was two planes hit the towers, some fires started, then the towers fell down.
Don't worry man, holograms don't have feelings bruh. They aren't offended. I didn't say that no one died at all. Sorry though but, there weren't any planes that crashed. I can actually flippantly say what ever I like :) free speech is still a thing even if your not into it there are plenty of people still holding strong. I like how you pick on my more conventional theory. I feel you will have a better time defeating the "resident evil" theories though. ;) To be clear, I do think people died in the buildings.Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael J Hewson
...two planes ...three buildings went down? Wait.. Huh? You do know a third building went straight down like a slinky right? You sure have a lot of faith in a govt who has been proven to lie and gives zero shits about your health and well being. It's no better in Austrailia. Or did her majesty stop sending convicts to colonies and genocide that amazing continent. Ps if you get a chance to ask why they did that Joe Rogan seems very confused about the motivations of organized psychopaths.Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael J Hewson
How would you feel if you found out there were real people on those planes?Quote:
Originally Posted by Humanfit
Listen Alex Mac, you find those people (start in Pennsylvania) and get back to me. The people on the plane are not the issue here in my opinion.
Listen Jeffery Dahmer, not having empathy for the dead is a huge issue that needs to be addressed. Its a sign of a greater issue in your thinking.
I think your lack of courtesy and empathy for us that are living is a little more concerning than my alleged lack of empathy for the dead. I didn't say "yeah they died and I'm glad, saves me a trip to McDonald's?" (Like dahmer?) you sir should be embarrassed at your implication that because I don't know if there were planes I'm somehow comparable to a guy who murdered his botched sex slave experiments. Did I compare you to one of his victims because your arguments are so bad it seems like a part of your brain was cut out? Nope. I didn't. You just lost all credibility in my book. Not how to win an argument, not at all.Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael J Hewson
(hopefully) You are just sensitive because you realise how much of a big deal it is to deny human beings exist.
Too late Hewson. The forum has eyes. They see it.
See rebekah roth for what happened to those passengers. She's not 100% right about everything, but regarding those who were allegedly on the planes that hit the buildings, that much she was.Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael J Hewson
Debunking of the cel calls:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mGB9A4ODmFo
When airphones are used, your cel doesnt show up on the caller ID at home. Several phones were answered familiarly, as they were caller ID identified. Verified timelines that put those planes at 35,000 feet, would have crossed too many cel towers too quickly and there is no way the tower handshakes could have even remotely kept up even if they were somehow able to connect a call from that altitude.
Simply not believable, like pretty much everything else in the 911 commission report. If mythbusters was not huge corporately owned and funded, then this would have been their episode:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=69p_91_T7qE
I dont want to go on about these topics, its not why I came here, but the other really good one on this is jfk to 911, everything is a rich man's trick - laid out very well by a british historian. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U1Qt6a-vaNM
If people died on 9/11 they would be listed on the official Social Security death index. None of them are.Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael J Hewson
Busted.
by that rationale, since the sandy hook kids did not appear on the fbi's list of gun murders for the year, then that piece of evidence alone would be enough to show it was also pre set up.Quote:
Originally Posted by Primalredemption