what!? palhares out of adcc now too?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Anthony Herrera

They're putting the pussy on a pedestal

---

Pussy sells!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I mean vagina.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jack LaBarge

Maybe you have short memory

The difference in Rondas subs is her opponents don't tap in time. Lack of experience & ego. Don't be blaming vagina.

---

Dont tap in time and letting go only when the ref stops it aren't very different

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jack LaBarge

Maybe you have short memory

The difference in Rondas subs is her opponents don't tap in time. Lack of experience & ego. Don't be blaming vagina.

---

To be more specific, they refuse to tap so she pops their elbow. In one case, an opponent fake tapped and Ronda stopped cranking. But she held on to it, and when the ref didn't stop it, THEN she continued to crank again and the person tapped more convincingly. That's a huge difference between cranking, feeling the tap, cranking harder, having a ref jump on you, and cranking harder to get one more second of pain in.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ryan Brick

Dont tap in time and letting go only when the ref stops it aren't very different

---

read above. its VERY different. Miesha was armbarred, but she refused to tap so it got popped. Kaufmann was armbarred, tapped, Ronda let go; no broken limbs.

Pierce taps, Palhares crank, ref steps in, Palhares cranks more. Big difference.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by David Rosado

To be more specific, they refuse to tap so she pops their elbow. In one case, an opponent fake tapped and Ronda stopped cranking. But she held on to it, and when the ref didn't stop it, THEN she continued to crank again and the person tapped more convincingly. That's a huge difference between cranking, feeling the tap, cranking harder, having a ref jump on you, and cranking harder to get one more second of pain in.

---

This!

Yep the results are in: yes, its unanimous. He is an idiot.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by David Rosado

To be more specific, they refuse to tap so she pops their elbow. In one case, an opponent fake tapped and Ronda stopped cranking. But she held on to it, and when the ref didn't stop it, THEN she continued to crank again and the person tapped more convincingly. That's a huge difference between cranking, feeling the tap, cranking harder, having a ref jump on you, and cranking harder to get one more second of pain in.

---

Yes!^

Ryan maybe you need to rewatch those fights they're no way similar. When Ronda's opponents tap she lets go immediately!

All this Paul Harris is innocent crap is like the crying mother on the news telling everybody her baby boy is good boy, he's just a angel and the police killed him. Yet, he's been arrested 30 times and he was shooting at the police. lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ryan Brick

Whats the difference between how Ronda Rousey wins and how Palhares wins?

Seriously both have crazy finishing moves and both continually break there opponents limbs, i see no difference in situation except ronda has a viagina and is a hero for repeatedly breaking peoples arms.

Palhares let go of his last heal hook in 1.0x seconds. Your taught to drive 4 car lengths behind people so you have 4 seconds to react to there actions. He let go as soon as the ref jumped in, anyone who has been robbed at a tournament knows the value of that.

I think he is a fool for dropping out of adcc and giving up a chance most people would kill for.

---

Lol If you need 4 seconds of reaction time to put your foot on the brake you have no business driving. Your talking about factoring in stopping 3000 plus pound vehicle at high rate of speed and accounting for mechanical lag. I'm not sure what they are teaching drivers in Canada but I have never heard of a 4 car length rule. You might be referring to a "2 second rule" but stopping distance depends on your speed 4 car lengths would be excessive at a rate of 20 mph. Why do they tell you to increase the distance in wet conditions, dose the human reaction time slow down when it's raining? Your analogy fails on so many levels.

http://youtu.be/nmNbb4stsY8

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jonathan Wylie

I think re watching this kind of settles it my mind. If you look at the Mike Pierce fight as a isolated incident it's kind of debatable about him holding to long or letting go or not increasing pressure after the tap and so on. But taking this fight and his of odd behavior on top of hurting the guy in adcc and Bustamante's statement I think Dana took that in to consideration and was justified in his decision.

---

My post from the other thread since the debate has resurfaced here.

well i hope he does metamoris, alan belcher challenged him on twitter and metamoris said that there are interested and they will get a hold of him.

https://twitter.com/alanbelcherufc