Not what I'm getting at at all, I would never claim a belt rank. Just curious to see how the belt was translated from style to style
Printable View
I like what Nathan Orchard said at the Portland seminar. Something along the lines of, when he can't think of a reason why you shouldn't get promoted then you are ready, if there is any doubt whatsoever then they are not ready to be promoted.
Just make the trip to your closest moon and learn, you will get an idea of where you are at.
I'm not concerned with rank until I get to actually train full time at a 10P school, (I'm like 2 hours away from 10P Chicago and plan on checking it out). I don't really care what banner my grappling falls under, I just really love being on the mat and improving. Btw, I just put it together that you're the guy from the security cam wrestler video, you're a bad mofo lolol
One of the guys I trained with in germany was a LL blue belt i think, and a lot of the stuff he showed was super legit. goes well with jj but I think Coach Zog hit the nail on the head.
however the positive from that is, you can get belted in both disciplines and that sounds cool. :D
I agree, the styles are completely different, (LL is almost always offensively based, heavy on the takedowns, emphasis on guard passing, having good top control) compared to the defensive guard based Jiu Jitsu game (not that you can't be a top guy in jiu jitsu). The only thing I get hung up on is the objective is the exact same, anything that works in JJ will be effective in LL, and vice versa
I didn't realize 1) there were luta livre places in the US, and 2) there was a belt system. Do you mind explaining the belt system? I read it HERE, but what's the time-frame? I take it there's live rolling?