But surviving by covering up, running or fighting defensively is what you do when you've almost had your head punched off. Could you call if smart tactics to trade punches with Maynard after getting rocked so badly ?
Printable View
But surviving by covering up, running or fighting defensively is what you do when you've almost had your head punched off. Could you call if smart tactics to trade punches with Maynard after getting rocked so badly ?
freddy i think gray should fight george sotoropilos next not ben henderson...
Sure, absolutely, it was a very smart tactics (instinct), and I give Franky HUGE props for the heart he showed in that fight. By playing defense, he was able to give himself time recover enough to give Gray the fight of his life in the next four rounds. But, at the end of the day, it is a (sport) fight and, in my opinion, you don't score points by playing good defense. Like Dana White said, "10-7's are a unicorn," so, realistically, 10-8 was the proper score. Honestly, if I was one of the three judges, I probably would have been too chicken to score it a '10-7' round because of the "unicorn factor," so I would have scored it a 10-8. Anyway, it is what it is. I thought the fight was awesome, way better than I had expected.Quote:
Originally Posted by Freddy Chavez
Does anybody know of an MMA fight where a round was scored 10-7? I'd like to see what an official '10-7' round looks like. I can't think of one off the dome.
I think Nate Quarry got a 10-7 against a canadian . I forget who..He was on season 3 of tuf. I think if Frankie were on his back and still taking punches for the rest of round 1 then yes 10-7 is fair. But he wasn't so 10-8 was a better scoring.
You must be thinking of endurance marathon runner Kalib Starnes:Quote:
Originally Posted by Freddy Chavez
From Wikipedia: "In his final UFC bout, he lost a unanimous decision to Nate Quarry at UFC 83 in Montreal Canada. Kalib spent the majority of the match circling, and trying to avoid fighting. The pro-Canadian crowd began cheering for the American, Quarry, and booing Starnes, the Canadian, loudly. Quarry even began mocking his opponent towards the end of the 3rd round by doing the 'Running Man' until the horn sounded. One judge scored the bout 30–24 in Quarry's favour, marking the second-largest margin of victory in UFC history."
30-24 is pretty bad.
Not seeing why everyone on the internet flipping about the draw. I watched it with my dad (former fighter), Both my coach's (former fighter and currant fighter) 2 guys from my jiu jitsu school (both fighters) and my mom (only fight on record, was some drunk chick who backed into her porsche, than tried to drive away.....she won, by the way)lol. My point.... we all yelled Holy Crap, that was a draw, as soon as the fight was over. So we all agree with the draw call as well.
Hate to disagree with you, but a takedown scores anytime you successfully take your opponent down. If he is able to stop any control beyond the initial takedown, then he as just got good abilities in getting back up, but he still got took down and the mark goes in the column. Thus why wrestlers must compete in jj matches at compatible skill levels in years. Otherwise they would dominate beginner divisions by just scoring takedowns.Quote:
Originally Posted by miketubbs
I think Edgar did enough to win. I was surprised and impressed he made it out of the 1st round. It does deserve another match though.
I scored it for Edgar, but very closely. Not unhappy about the draw, it was a great fight.
I scored it 48-46 for Gray.....But the rounds were close.
I was ok with the draw call too though.....But I wish they would just have Edgar and Pettis fight then give Gray the first shot at the winner of that fight.