Originally Posted by
Chris Garry
Bobby I have no doubt your DLR is awesome dude. Do you think anyone training purely no gi could have an awesome DLR?
I really like the old school/electric chair analogy you made early on. Thats struck quite a chord with me.
Great discussion, playing devils advocate to an extent we all respect how incredibly good Kennan is however I think his DLR was ineffective there, against a guy who Keenan could probably have done better against from close guard.
Rustev might be amazing at footlocks I have no idea but all of the attempts I saw were submission before position and we all know that is not the way to go thanks to Zog for one. So it doesnt go anyway to proving DLR as some sort of safety zone which its not.
I also dont think DLR is as good for submission only as it is in pts matches, which is what I believe we should all be heading towards, when watching the match you posted from the correct perspective Keenan is comfortable, in control and the favourite throughout. If it was 'submission only' Rustev was the one going for toeholds and even without any control this is better odds for a finish in sub only than DLR guard where youre quite a long way from a sub. In reality a submission only match would have looked a lot different.
Was Keenan using lots of DLR in the Kumiet I cannot recall?
I'd love to see some instances of it working in no gi.
Bobby youve give fantastic advice on the DLR its certainly opened my eyes to the possiblities, I have respect for anyone who has mastered or is on the way to mastering such advanced guards like DLR which is why I want to try it out however personally am still cautious.
I shall see your Keenan and raise you 1 Cyborg