Printable View
Often, one of the hardest aspects of taking positions that are counter to a conspiracy theory is pinning down what exactly the position of the other side is, exactly. Sometimes, I argue in favor of conspiracy theories, its just as fun.Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Steinmetz
I think you underestimate my age. It's fairly simple to tell the difference between 60's video footage and state-of-the-art visual effects from the 60's ... I'm very sorry that you cannot see that difference.Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Steinmetz
As far as accepting reality. Moon landing "truth" was my reality for many years. I was born in the early 70's and did not actually start looking into the hoax until well into my 30's probably. And at first I was extremely skeptical. But I've eaten a lot of psychedelic drugs starting at about the age of 14 or so, and I think that helped play a part in my ability to choose the red pill. I wanted to know the truth, and I didn't give a fuck what that meant to my reality. I'd rather live in the real work eating gruel and being cold all the time than live in the matrix believing bullshit... so I investigated. A lot. I've read and studied extensively this subject. The more time I spent the obvious it became. So to me, it's guys like you who can see reality right in front of them in a video and not see the truth... THAT's not accepting reality.
You seem pretty smart, so I'm guessing it's not lack of intellect that leaves you blind to what to many of us seems obvious. I suspect it's because you are unable or unwilling to do the work required to assimilate this kind of information into your worldview. It changes too much for you. It forces you to re-evaluate almost everything you think you know. Not only that, but if you tell anyone then you'll be a crazy conspiracy theorist to them, which is a bad move socially.
As far as who I've asked about it? You expect me to give you contact info for personal friends I have made in my many years of schooling and professional work? Uh, how about no... I'm not claiming I am friends with any NASA guys or with anyone who worked on the program. I'm not even claiming I've spoken to guys with PHD's in rocket science. All I'm saying is I've spent a lot of years in colleges, in grad programs, in the professional engineering industry. I've made a few friends in my time who are much more intelligent and educated than me. There is pretty strong consensus with those people. That doesn't prove anything, other than the smartest friends I have agree with me. Shrug, your mileage may vary.
Truth is I just believe whatever Eddie believes. Eddie says moon landing is fake, good enough for me.
I really do think the psychedelics helped (it's no wonder the government doesn't want us using them). Once I got deep enough to realize this entire 3-dimensional world is not exactly real, it med realizing the moon landings were faked much easier. It makes recognizing reality much easier when you've spent enough time with the veil lifted.
The "world" is four dimensional but I agree that psychedelics can be very beneficial and often lead people to skepticism.
Well one thing I can tell you is that I dont put much stock in aliens in spaceships. I'm extremely skeptical. A civilization even 10,000 years ahead of us technologically would be completely invisible to us and beyond our wildest imaginations. Flying saucers isnt very imaginative. Metal spaceships flying them around doing anal probes on humans, give me a break. That's about as believable as the moon landings.Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Steinmetz
In sure in a hundred years WE will have flying saucers with anti-gravity drives or whatever. So the aliens are using technology we are almost capable of? I think not. That's the thoughts of a mind that has no understanding of what technology is or how it works and grows.
Psychedelics are not detected by standard drug screens. Pot is a mild psychedelic, mostly when eaten, but not really. You cant really compare it to ayahuasca or iboga. They are very different experiences. As far as my experiences, I was using LSD and mushrooms on a regular basis before I was out of highschool. I used LSD and mushrooms at least 100 times between 14 and 24 years old, 100 is probably a low estimate. I use psychedelics less these days at 43 years old, but I have also graduated to more powerful ones. Ayahuasca and Iboga in particular. They can certainly increase creativity, but in my experience that's a side effect. In suitable doses they are a tool for self-improvement.Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Steinmetz
Crazy shaman and psychonaughts say that they talk to their ancestors or angles or aliens while on high doses of psychedelics.... I'm not going to argue with them. I've spent a lot of time there. I don't know what to call it, or how do describe it, but it's more real that this material work we spend so much time in. Impossible to explain, you simply have to experience it.
I'm not going to try to enumerate the list of conspiracy theories. Just google for them. If you want to ask me about any specific ones, I'll tell you my opinions. In general, I find most of the false flag theories very credible. 911, Kennedy, sandy hook, pearl harbor. Those seem completely packed with fuckery. You know where I stand on moon landings. I'm convinced that a high-technology civilization was living on Earth before the end of the last Ice Age. I find the work of guys like Boval, Hancock, Carlson, and similar to be extremely compelling. Those theories I give very high probabilities to.
I give very low probabilities to things like Bigfoot and Flying Saucers.
I've done a little bit of research into crop circles and chem-trails and for me the jury is still out on those. I'm not really sure one way or the other, I need more information to draw any serious conclusions. I find compelling information on both sides of those subjects.
Crop circles for example seem a little crazy to me, what's that aliens or angels or something, that doesnt make much sense. I believe in shit I have empirical evidence for.. But you know what else doesn't make sense? The size of the Earth and the size of the Moon square the circle... so go fucking figure. At this point I'll at least consider anything no matter how fucking crazy it might sound at first. If you don't know what I'm talking about with squaring the circle it's far too complicated a subject for me to get into in a forum like this. I'd just suggest you watch Secrets in Plain Sight on youtube, somewhere in hour 3 he'll get into those things.
This is at least a taste.... it's not going to explain any of it, for that you'll have to dig. But about 35 seconds in you'll see the diagram I'm referring to. Learn how to square the circle geometrically with an equation. Then use wikipedia to get the size of the earth and moon. Then plug the values in. Magic. The universe is magic.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T7GYcXDpIBE
The perimeter of the square is equal to the circumference of the circle.... except pi is irrational, so you can never get perfect. That's the metaphore.
It's not a coincidence that the Freemason's primary symbol is the compass and square. Those are the tools to draw the circle and the square, respectively. We, as humans, are in a quest to square the circle, as those before us.
Attachment 3548
lmao you win.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Ludington
Its the dose. Try taking a single, small toke.Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Steinmetz
"What software are you using to determine if an image is fake?"
The same software one would use to determine Lord Of The Rings uses CGI, it's called "Your Eyes" :)