Originally Posted by
Ben Eddy
I think it's a game plan a person could have for sure. You know you're giving up the money if you take that route though. And you take the risk of A: tiring yourself out (which I think somewhat happened to Soto by the time he got to the finals) and B: if you get subbed in any OT or before you lose. So I'm not sure it's all that great of a game plan or if it would pay off.
I don't think Soto really played that game though. His jits was pretty explosive and impressive as far as I saw. It was quite impressive to me to see an MMA guy have better back control than a Miyao brother. That's Miyao's game and Soto beat him at it. I wouldn't say that Miyao was going for subs in OT, he was just trying to control Soto and he couldn't.
If Miyao would have beat out Soto by being 15 seconds quicker, it's unlikely he would of tapped to Cummings leg locks as we have seen him with Tonon just not be subbed to legs. So then we see another OT and Miyao wins with a 0$ prize pool? Could have happened for sure and I still wouldn't argued Miyao tried to do that, it's just what happened and how his style matched up with the other guys.
But yes, I do think we will see some guys choose to just slow things down in OT if they get taken there. I don't think we will see many try to get there because of the money incentive, cardio etc. But if a match gets taken to OT then yes I think there will be guys who decide holding a person for more time is better than trying for a risky sub.
Maybe setting up a time limit for the first two OT rounds is a good idea to try and limit how much time OT can take up? Or make the first two rounds time not matter, then just the third round have it be time and sub? Then you have the first two rounds where you just want to try a submission and the last round where there is strategy.