Yo Guys, I gotta Red Pill you about the real shape of the Earth

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Craig Murray

So why doesn't the sun fall to earth like the ice?

---

The Sun is at a much higher elevation than the glass sky- "zero gravity" so to speak. It is held in stasis by the outward force of "gravity" and inward force of 'levity'. The Central celestial sphere is like the inner charge plate of a massive capacitor, with the glass sky acting as a conductor and the outer surface of the earth acting as the opposite charge plate.

This might seem like a funny concept to you but it's actually how things really work on Earth. For instance: lightning bolts. The surface has a charge, the clouds have an opposite charge. Boom, all that potential is released. The charge is palpable: it makes the hair stand up on peoples necks.

With the earth however, you have an insulator between these two plates so no discharge takes place. Glass is an excellent insulator. The Earth could very well be a giant spherical capacitor.

It's already been proven that certain setups of electromagnetism have a distinct "anti gravity effect". Because gravity is nothing more than outward charge pressure to begin with. You counter that force and suddenly you are "levitating" (Biefield-Brown effect).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Primalredemption

Ice is totally transparent when formed at very cold temperatures. And no the moon is not cheese.

---

if the ice is falling that means it's accumulating. Which means there is air up there with moisture to condense into ice? But it's cold up there to create completely transparent ice on the ceiling of the earth?

And why doesnt the sun fall? And what shape is the moon?

The moon is round, but since we have never seen the other side of it there is no point in conjecture. The side we can see is likely spherical.

Hey to Eddie bravo I know how to prove earth is flat or a sphere e-mail me at Cantelmichael@gmail.com

Apparently you didn’t even finish reading the article you cited as the very next line describes the reasoning behind the trajectory. This is great example of confirmation bias and bad research.

“ The reason, Krupp’s technicians quickly appreciated, was that the earth’s atmosphere grows thinner the higher the altitude. Consequently, at the higher elevations, a long-range shell is travelling for a greater part of its trajectory through very thin air, increasing the range. This phenomenon would be significant for the Paris Gun project.”