IS GENESIS HISTORY
IS A CREATION DOCUMENTARY THAT POKES SO MANY HOLES IN 'THE BIG BANG THEORY' , EVOLUTION AND THE AGE OF THE EARTH FOSILS AND COSMIC EVIDENCE
MUST SEE CAUSE THEY ARE LYING ABOUT THE AGE OF THE EARTH
https://youtu.be/LsOSIT9fYCM
Printable View
IS GENESIS HISTORY
IS A CREATION DOCUMENTARY THAT POKES SO MANY HOLES IN 'THE BIG BANG THEORY' , EVOLUTION AND THE AGE OF THE EARTH FOSILS AND COSMIC EVIDENCE
MUST SEE CAUSE THEY ARE LYING ABOUT THE AGE OF THE EARTH
https://youtu.be/LsOSIT9fYCM
bro, nobody's watching an hour and 45 of thatQuote:
Originally Posted by lattamoney
maybe try to make a point and reference a time in there so that this travesty can be dismantled in bits and pieces instead of firing 500 pounds of shit at a wall and saying let's examine it
Which has more evidence of existence, the Big Bang or Jesus?
JESUS . The Big Bang is a Theory that they still cant proveQuote:
Originally Posted by Eddie Bravo
Just Look into it it will blow your mindQuote:
Originally Posted by Eddie Bravo
The Documentary is amazing
Are they mutually exclusive? I don't think Jesus ever disclaimed the Big Bang.Quote:
Originally Posted by Eddie Bravo
Depending on what is the definition of "evidence" - well, us Christians are not on such firm ground either. When was Jesus born... we don't really know, we just have tradition. Did Jesus really say all the things in the Bible ... again, it was oral tradition until it was written down a hundred or more years later.
It is an interesting topic to discuss and debate but in my experience there are many people who just want to spout their beliefs and not explore the ideas. Questioning faith makes it stronger, not weaker - Socrates was apparently killed because he made people uncomfortable for the reason that they couldn't explain *why* they believed what they believed
who proved Jesus? The belief in Jesus is based on faith not science.Quote:
Originally Posted by lattamoney
Exactly my Point have you ever looked at both sides of the of the argument ? Or just what they taught you in school?Quote:
Originally Posted by SebG
Big Bang
We evolved from nothing
we are here for no purpose
God
We were created by a living loving God
We were created with Purpose
I want people to look at both sides not just what they were taught in school
science is awesome but they mix in their agenda with is and try to say it proves things it dose not
example carbon 14 does not prove the age of a rock
The Belief in the Big Bang is Faith not ScienceQuote:
Originally Posted by Sean Finecey
They can NOT Prove the Big Bang they spent billions of dollars on a hadron Collider can they still cant prove the Big Bang
They Mix Science and evolution to cover up holes in the Big Bang Theory
Im just saying look at the evidence watch the Documentary see what you think dont just believe what they taught you in school
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eddie Bravo
if you talk to Alex Jones ask him about Kent Hovnid
Kent pokes so many holes in the Big Bang Theory Dude is like a Black Belt with it
Carbon 14 radio-isotope testing is not used to date rocks.Quote:
Originally Posted by lattamoney
Big Bang theory does not claim something came out of nothing.
Evidence of a Big Bang or an Inflation does not disprove a loving God.
Evidence for evolution does not disprove a loving God.
The above simply disprove that the Bible is a science book. Is that what you think it is?
The impression I get is that you appear to claim that every single scientist and engineer in the world has an anti-God bias and *deliberately* develops false scientific theories as well as accurate ones. I don't want to misinterpret your debate but that is the impression I get.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SebG
There is no Evidence of the Big Bang
There is no Evidence of evolution
Most Scientist mix Factual science with and with a outlandish claim that cant be proved .
And yes most scientist do have anti God agendas
you can not believe in both
God Created us.
or we evolved from monkeys
I disagree that one cannot believe in both. It is clear that the Bible is not a science book. A few times you have misquoted science -Quote:
Originally Posted by lattamoney
e.g. you claimed that Carbon-14 radio isotope methods are used to date rocks, which it is not.
Also, evolution doesn't claim that humans evolved from monkeys - instead the evidence appears to show that humans and monkeys both evolved from a common ancestor.
"God created us" could simply be an allegory - have you read "2001 A Space Odyssey"?
I am still not convinced that there is a conflict between scientific investigation and a Loving God as outlined in the Bible. You haven't stated any particular facts to "prove" the Bible truth and yet you claim that scientists make outlandish claims that can't be proved.
Science uses scientific method. That's how we have arrived at using computers and mobile phones every day and how we are even having this discussion. So the scientific method is agnostic.
watch the documentary they poke holes in everything you just saidQuote:
Originally Posted by sebg
Kent Hovind just uses the Presuppositional Argument. He never gets into proving his stance.
LOL.Quote:
Originally Posted by CShahgholi
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presup...al_apologetics
Could have saved a lot of time if I'd known that from the start. I imagine there are a lot of problems with that approach, one simply being interpretation of Bible passages - when to take it literally, when to "interpret". I know a person who is convinced that the physics of the universe changed after "Noah's flood" and that there were no rainbows before then.