https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0TmzcvaQ51k
Printable View
:-)
"the question whether or not the motion of the earth is space can be made perceptible in terrestrial experiments... all attempts of this nature led to a null result.' - Albert Einsten.................. The earth does not move but I'm the dumb dumb.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QpXSQDVqzsA
He pretty much said that the universe is flat
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hHMSvSqCDKc
I don't really watch jre anymore unless Eddie or Joey Diaz is on... without listening to it he's probably talking about inflation theory which says that the universe is flat, curved or ballon shaped. All of which are ad hoc theories to justify Edwin Hubble discovering the red shift of stars claiming that everything in the universe is moving away from earth which would make earth the center of the universe. All this is b.s.... the earth is a flat irregular plane with the sun moon and stars revolving above it inside of an enclosed (domed) system. The stars are at a fixed distance and rotate above us... they are not 'expanding into infinite space'.
Well he said a little bit more than that , i liked it
he said that at some point before time existed there was nothing but then again something and everything was on top of each other so at that point something happened and we came in to being , i thought it sounded great with the Noah's ark story,
cus its like we survived you know... and he said something else too in my words , that we are the flat plane that is the very first thing and everything we look at in the stars is the old stuff the history , so we are like the very new the newest thing in existence .
I liked it it tight the religion stuff with the motivating factor that life is worth living cus you are at 1st place no matter what you know ;)
Meaning time is moving in to the Earth ... if that makes sense
“Such a condition would imply that we occupy a unique position in the universe, analogous, in a sense, to the ancient conception of a central earth’ - Edwin Hubble.................... but I'm the tard
You would think that after faking 6 moon missions the average person would need an insane amount of irrefutable eveidence anytime a space agency would make any kind of claim
Look into Directed Energy/Operation Tripod/Anthrax attack bioweapons lab/Dr.DavidKelly/Extremophile Bacteria Solfolobus Metallicus.
how's about the chinese landing there?
there's some dudes that say there were glass domes and shit on the moon and that's part of the coverup
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d7MfYzdlkJY
(sorry that one is way long)
specifically mentions some commonalities...
but this just really makes me think that the moon has some nonzero atmosphere to it.
more likely I think, is that dr greer is correct
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-duAuIqsOQ
which if we discovered that shit in the 50s, then the rocketry was part of the cover up.
I just want muh free energies
dr greer's work basically corroborates dr judy wood's explanation of 911, too (which is the only remotely sensible explanation, but you'd have to watch her presentation to get all those points.)