Originally Posted by
Jonas Schäfer
Sorry but I'm not buying that you're majoring in maths while using words like real and not real to describe geometries or saying something like euclidean geometry being 2d.
Where did you get the notion that they used spherical geometry to explain a round earth and why is it "not real", please pinpoint me to where in the video it was brought up, I don't understand what might be interpreted that way. And either way just because somebody said something in a youtube video doesn't mean it has to be true, same goes for posts (including this one, how meta is that :p) one sees in forums or on social media.
I know what math is. I'm a physics undergraduate, but thanks for quoting Wikipedia and then making up your own definition around it (to be fair, the concept of maths as a language is widespread and actually somewhat fitting imo).
I thought it obvious that I was referring to a nobel prize in physics as we were talking about the geometries in the context of a "flat earth" and arising problems when considering the observed data.
You're looking for the word light-year if i'm not mistaken LuT, and quantum physics has nothing to do with something being distant away. Also claiming something that basically IS the subject you're studying to be nothing more than guesswork is quite odd to me.
If you're just an elaborate troll, hats off though^^
I couldn't agree more, science is about a lot more than fancy vocabulary.