Originally Posted by
Gray
The main issue with holistic IMO is there is very few peer reviewed research on it. There's just as much monetary bias going on, the few studies done are usually done by companies with a stake in holistic healing. So it has the same baggage as the FDA, but with less easily verifiable study results. A lot of it is based upon tradition and folk medicine. Don't get me wrong, I think there is a lot of folk medicine out there that is truly reliable, hell take a look at aspirin. But just because your mother's mother did it, doesn't mean its actually effective. A lot of products have studies that look like they were run by MuscleTech.
Also in the field of nutrition I think there is more bias created by special interest groups that sell products than by Pharma. The dairy council is a great example of this, they greatly use their funds to change public perception on dairy, its affect on health and use political lobbying to ensure that it remains a cornerstone in federally mandated diet guidelines.
I take supplements, but I also take a look into peer reviewed research on the supplements before I do. I think Aaron, while being hyper sensitive, did have a good point. I will agree that federal mandates on healthy lifestyles are extremely unreliable due to political pressuring from special interest groups. There are a lot of vitamins/minerals I feel have RDA's that are completely off, its just hard to give a good parabola on RDA's for such a diverse population. I feel that over the next several decades we are going to see adverse effects from over supplementing of vitamins through fortification, but it might be lost/misinterpreted with the current obesity crisis.
Overall, if you and your wife are experiencing a high quality of life on your current regiment I doubt we will ever agree on the subject of holistic medicine.