Originally Posted by
derrick ikwueme
what a retard that dude is, jiujitsu aint about fucking points period. If you go crazy trying to avoid getting points scored on you then you'll gass and be fucked, Royce won against giant monsters by using Helio's philosophy
and that's the jiujitsu that got most of us involved. & when dudes have specialized points training and even train with time limits in the academy there missing the whole point and essence of jiujitsu. That's why Helio split from the ibjjf and was never down with points. & for the small dudes in my class Helio's philosophy is really the only chance they have to beat bigger dudes that know what they know.
I think points can be appropriate. Do we all want to see more submissions? Absolutely! It's the most fun part of the art. I would like to understand what people want though. Do people want ADCC and the Worlds for example, to be submission only, with a draw when the time limit is reached. If you have it go to a ref's decision, then you run into the problem you have now, where people just try to appear more active in the eyes of the judges. Realistically this would make tournaments almost impossible, as draws would happen often at the top level.
I think simply saying let's do away with points is like cutting off the head to stop the headache. The biggest reason points are abused has to do with the officiating. In wrestling you can't back up without a stalling penalty. In Jiu-Jitsu you have to have a 5 minute staring contest before a ref calls a warning. If more aggressive stalling calls were implemented, it would help tremendously. ADCC also has a good idea, with no points in the first half, people open their games up. Eddie Bravo had a good idea for his 10th Planet tournaments to do the PSL/Budo Challenge thing and have "catch points" for close submission attempts. That's a good solution also.
On some level too, I think a lot of this is a non-issue. The whole "abusing points to eek out a win" is vastly over exaggerated. When you get to the finals of ADCC or the Worlds, the matches are going to be close. Most championship games or matches in other sports, from basketball to Judo, are won in close margins, and usually aren't blowouts. If you look at the last Worlds and the last ADCC, most of the Gold medalists finished almost all of their matches. Even the ones that didn't win their Gold medal matches by submission, they almost all won the majority of their other matches by submission.
Metamoris was exciting, even the matches that didn't end in submission. Lots of Worlds '12 and ADCC '11 matches were awesome that ended in points, but had guys pushing the pace. I follow competition BJJ pretty close, and gi or no-gi, I can think of maybe a handfull of competitors that really abuse the point system to try to win on advantages. The best guys out there are finishing most of their matches. I'm telling you guys, the people that try to squeak by on advantages are getting exposed and losing. Pablo Popovitch (who stalls on the reg) tried to stall while up on 2 points on Lovato at the last No-Gi Worlds and paid for it. Claudio Calasans (who usually hunts for the finish) tried to stall on points on Otavio Souza at the Worlds this year in the finals, and it cost him the Gold. It's not a smart strategy and the best guys know this.
Bookmarks