Our amazing future president?

[James III]

Going around shooting people falls under "freedom" too, should that be legal? That's why we have Call of Duty and Condoms man, you can't go around thinking you should have 100% freedom, or crazy fucks like you would be RAMPANT.

Thinking that killing your kid is okay if it's below 2 years is the most ridiculous viewpoint I've ever heard, . .

Well said Jay!! This lunatic isn't too bright is he?

[Frank R.]

Why do you have to keep calling him a bitch because you have different opinions/points of view? I remember you attacking me as well for something we didn't agree on. People can have discussions without ever agreeing, so why make it more than that with insults? Next will come you claiming he's some other guy with a different screen name. I think you said I was Frank James because the name calling wasn't cutting it. Calm down...

[Jay Chow]

He's only giving back what he is getting, which isn't the best way to do it, but you can't have a go at James when it's both of them.

[James III]

Why do you have to keep calling him a bitch because you have different opinions/points of view? I remember you attacking me as well for something we didn't agree on. People can have discussions without ever agreeing, so why make it more than that with insults? Next will come you claiming he's some other guy with a different screen name. I think you said I was Frank James because the name calling wasn't cutting it. Calm down...

If anyone wants to know what this guy is about check out his first ever 2 posts with his latest account.

http://www.10thplanetjj.com/threads/...-base-near-you...

Now why would you join a Jiu-jitsu site just to make those your first two posts huh?

Nuff said

[Frank R.]

Eh... My latest account is my only account. I got this account the day the new site came up. My first post was way after so you really don't make any sense.

[Bryan Brown]

[Nathan K.]

Going around shooting people falls under "freedom" too, should that be legal? That's why we have Call of Duty and Condoms man, you can't go around thinking you should have 100% freedom, or crazy fucks like you would be RAMPANT.

You've missed the point. Free will is paramount to liberty. Everyone should be free to make their own choices and deal with the consequences when they make bad ones. If we could install microchips inside a person's brain to inhibit them from murder, I would be against it. The role of government should be to protect the freedoms of individuals by ensuring that others aren't able to infringe upon them. If you kill or attack someone, you are infringing upon their right to life. If you steal from someone, you are infringing upon their right to property. If you rape someone, you are infringing upon their free will. Government only has the right to enter your life when you take away another's freedoms. (Keep in mind that this is how AMERICA is supposed to work according to our Constitution.)

That said, it is MY belief that children have NO GIVEN rights or freedoms. Their parents are responsible for what freedoms they have. They are naturally dependent upon their parents for EVERYTHING. If that is true, it means that they are property of their parents. Once they come to understand and respect freedom, they are naturally awarded the right to protect it.

I know that it sound callous and heartless to you, but most logic is. Once government has the ability to control how parents raise their OWN children in even one facet, it opens the door for any random official's ideologies to corrupt your family and private home. That's when you have the government placing security cameras inside of your house to make sure you're raising your children properly like in jolly 'ol England.

Thinking that killing your kid is okay if it's below 2 years is the most ridiculous viewpoint I've ever heard

I didn't say below 2 years. It could be 8 years old for that matter. Besides, I said nothing about it being right. I just don't think that it is my place to dictate morality to SOMEONE ELSE. I know... It's surprising to encounter a person that doesn't believe he knows what's best for others.

Please try to understand. You can never be morally right. You can only be morally right by your own beliefs. Every human being on this planet has their own ethical standards. Simply because you were raised to believe something different doesn't give you the right to attack a person. That is one of the reasons we have war.

How about becoming more aware of the fact that if you have unprotected sex, you should get that shit checked as soon as possible and abort as early as possible IF you are not ready.

I completely agree.

When it becomes an actual human being in and out of the womb, it then gets the right to live, as it should do. If it needs care or to be put up for adoption, why not?

The life of a child in the womb is worth less than the life of a five-year old?

If you actually believed what you are saying, I'd argue fully, but you are obviously trolololling, you divvy.

You're right. I'm just a "crazy fuck". I'm trolling because someone picked one sentence out of one of my replies, completely taking the thread off-topic, and attacked me for it. Then I defended myself with civility.

I'm sorry. I'm a maladjusted psycho. I give myself up. Sign me up for Ludovico therapy.

"A man wants to believe so he does. A smart man wants to believe, but he can't."

[The kza]

trolls trolling trolls while getting trolled

[Cody Kietzman]

trolls trolling trolls while getting trolled

Where's Taylor at?

[Emir Mehovic]

Where's Taylor at?

lol he got banned for threatning to post gay porn on the site lmao