I see your point Jack but TKOs are still pretty much the same as KOs. Look at Hardy's victory tonight. A KO is a one hitta quitta i get it but a TKO would eventually result in a fighter being out if the ref wasn't there. If the ref wasn't in the cage with Kimbo and Roy, Roy would have eventually knocked him out even though it would have been brutal and hard to watch. Just like Matt Hughes crucifixed BJ and pounded him out. The ref intervenes and prevents the fighter from going out which is what would inevitably happen. So they classify Dan's win tonight as a KO even though he landed like 4 elbows after he clipped Duane on the jaw...how is it a KO if the ref had to intervene and stop the punishment? what separates a KO from a TKO?