
Originally Posted by
Jared Gammel
Doesn't he specifically say in his DVD that he just wants to avoid weak body movements? My understanding was that flexibility, which he has, shouldn't be a crutch. He wants to focus on the strongest mechanical and structural body movements, which is the whole theory behind his perpendicular triangle finish. It makes sense to me.. you could teach it to anyone (not dependent on flexibility) and not risk injury, which he said he has witnessed before. And like others were saying it's a different brand. He also DID it quite alot.. you probably won't see him doing that anymore. My style has changed dramatically and I'm still a white belt. I imagine your style could change even more going from blue-black. Don't hate, to each their own.
This is also funny, because RG is not a weak body movement, and, unlike
Ryan claims, you are not to be flat on your back. It's also all about angles. So in essence, in my view, he is bashing what he knows not.
Nonetheless, although I believe strongly in angles, as you can see this intricate body positioning of higher belts, I believe that the 'strong body mechanics' stuff is a little bit of hype.
Don't get me wrong, it's not worthless, but very, very important, yet also important is sensitivity from various positions. If your training partner is good a putting you in positions that negate any possible structural advantage you can muster, then, for example you better be very good a working from flat off your back. More specifically, you should put yourself in bad position often just to work on them.
Or, another example, is sometimes in the triangle, you just can't get the angle to 'stomp and curl'. So, you have to also master varying type of squeezes to finish a fight. 'Stomp and curl' might be the best, but you also have to develop squeezes from even the bad angles.
I might be wrong, but that's what I see for now.