
Originally Posted by
Sam Sales
Fighters are told by the referees not to stop until the referee tells them to (because of Brazilian taps etc). So really the amount of time the sub was on before the ref stepped in is irrelevant. The refs position is not under Paul Harris' control. Also didn't Palhares let go of one early on Marquardt once? Then the ref made them carry on the fight and he got TKO'd? Either way, with Paul Harris he has a history of it and that is what likely got him cut. If he was a first offender I would be disagreeing with it, but I am not.

The amount of time before the tap is relevant because that's when the clock started on the damage. Now if he were cranking for 20 seconds while Pierce was tapping and let go the instant the ref intervened, we can cry foul on the ref. The ref jumped in as soon as he saw the tap and Palhares kept cranking FULL BLAST for a full 1 mississippi. Imagine a fighter still punching a tapping opponent for a full second after the ref is literally on top of them stopping the fight. Now imagine that fighter has a history of it. Palhares appears to intentionally want to dramatically injure his opponents. There's no room for that in
sports.
And no, Palhares didn't let go of Marquardt's leg. Nate slipped out and Palhares complained to the ref that his leg was slippery and got punched in the face for his stupidity. The ref didn't make them keep fighting. There was a fight going on. You can't call time out cuz your patented move didn't work. LOL.