For the higher belts, do women and feminine men make better jiu-jitsuists?
I've always thought feminine women make the best pure jiu-jitsuists because they are generally more receptive due to the nature, do you find this true? And what do the women of the forum feel about this.
I just thought the higher belts would have a better view of things, but I'm sure even someone who doesn't train can give some insight, please answer, I'd appreciate it.
I've always thought feminine women make the best pure jiu-jitsuists because they are generally more receptive due to the nature, do you find this true? And what do the women of the forum feel about this.
So what you're saying is having a receptive attitude makes a better BJJ player? Being open to new techniques and ideas has little to due with gender. It's a matter of perception. A better argument would be that, with less muscle tissue they are forced to be more technical. However technique is achieved through repetition, which again has to do with the person.
I've always thought feminine women make the best pure jiu-jitsuists because they are generally more receptive due to the nature, do you find this true? And what do the women of the forum feel about this.
I don't. But that's just my experience.
For me it's about the balance of soft and hard, yin and yang -- exemplary traits of both the male and the female,
So what you're saying is having a receptive attitude makes a better BJJ player? Being open to new techniques and ideas has little to due with gender. It's a matter of perception. A better argument would be that, with less muscle tissue they are forced to be more technical. However technique is achieved through repetition, which again has to do with the person.
i thought he was talking about being smaller and not about being a women