Hitler went to Argentina. Source: FBI

[Ross Davidson]

I have read this document all the way to page 123 of part 1, and it took me forever and I got a headache. I'm not about to get into that reading of discerning scribbles in cursive, redacted information bars, and figuring out terms like SAC (Special Agent in Charge) tonight.

I made my claims, and provided a source. If you wish to tear the theory apart, do what peer reviewers do and review the information. I have provided you with everything you need to rip it to shreds. Have at it.

Also, upon reading of news sources' understandings of the material, what I failed to pick up on was that FBI missions to Argentina were actually conducted, which says a couple things: I was wrong that the FBI didn't follow up on their intelligence that he was in Argentina, and they did indeed try to locate him; the FBI very much believed that their sources were credible in regards to him winding up in South America.

[Aaron Gustaveson]

Peer reviewers only have to look at the item they are reviewing though and it has references, in text, after each claim that needs supporting. They are experts in their fields and may have to check some things but they dont have to go through extensive primary literature normally.

If you dont want to convince anyone that requires evidence then thats fine. I understand why you wouldn't want to go through that document, not many people would.

[Drew Ash]

Well I dunno where you were hearing about it Drew, cause this is the first I have ever in my life heard about the FBI acknowledging that Hitler may have escaped Germany.

Also, none of what you say disproves that he didn't escape. In fact, much of the evidence points to him at least not dying in Berlin.

Government agencies are renown for how they don't play nicely with each other unless there is something really credible. For the military to communicate with an agency within the department of justice, something serious needs to happen.

And Aaron, your condescension is noted. It's also not my job to present evidence for your argument. If you wish to debate, dig and get the info for yourself.

Mhm, and I also cant disprove the existence of god, bigfoot, or the flying spaghetti monster. I guess you solved the case.

[Drew Ash]

Mhm, and I also cant disprove the existence of god, bigfoot, or the flying spaghetti monster. I guess you solved the case.

FallaciesPosterHigherRes.jpg

[Ross Davidson]

Lol I guess documents from the FBI stating about how they were actively searching for Hitler after his death, and DNA tests which show that the remains that they recovered weren't Hitler's and Braun's, just isn't enough for you. That's ok. For me it sheds light on the fact that something else likely happened.

[Aaron Gustaveson]

Lol I guess documents from the FBI stating about how they were actively searching for Hitler after his death, and DNA tests which show that the remains that they recovered weren't Hitler's and Braun's, just isn't enough for you. That's ok. For me it sheds light on the fact that something else likely happened.

Its interesting. Where can we read that the FBI was actively searching for Hitler?
What about the DNA test? Where can we read about that?
And that the FBI actually sent people to Argentina?
I tried to find a website that says where that info is in the document but no luck, though there are endless websites discussing the documents. I'd think that would be gold for conspiracy websites?

[Eddie Bravo]

A. Our government is filled with liars
B. Hitler's body was never recovered
C. Many Nazi's fled to South America
D. There are witnesses on video in Argentina that claim they knew him

Who knows for sure but I wouldn't be surprised one bit of it were true. If I was Hitler I would've fled to South America with the rest of the nazi crew. How is this so unbelievable again?

[Aaron Gustaveson]

Who said its unbelievable? Asking for evidence is admiting it is possible. Believing it is true without evidence is crazy/faith based.

[Eddie Bravo]

Who said its unbelievable? Asking for evidence is admiting it is possible. Believing it is true without evidence is crazy/faith based.

How is it crazy/faith based??

There is zero evidence that he committed suicide. The only reason that is the official story is because our government said so. M
I think it is super ultra crazy that anyone would believe anything the government says ESPECIALLY with no scientific evidence.

Again: A. The goverent is full of shit B. There is zero evidence hitler commited suicide C. Mad Nazis fled to South America D. The government is full of shit

[Chris Herzog]

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence of said evidence. It just means it may or may not exist. It is extremely plausible that Hitler did make it out of Germany. I don't have stock in the argument either way. But to completely dismiss the idea is absurd knowing the history of lies and fuck ups by our governmental agencies.