really interessting discussion here, particular intresting for a grappler from germany because Luta Livre in Germany is almost as big as bjj.
I had the pleasure to attend seminars and train with luta livre fighters like nicolas renier, leozada nogueira, pequeno, daniel d dane and andreas andyconda schmidt. And i must say that itīs sadly not black and white, and what i mean by that itīs hard to say that "luta livre emphasises submission before submission" or "luta livre emphasises top position". Like in bjj the styles differs from instructor to instructor. For example Nicolas Renier talks about "breaking the cycle", meaning that normaly there is a hirachy in position and a "natural" idea that you take the opponent down, pass the guard, get mount or backmount and then submit the opponent. Nicolas wants to attack from all positions to suprise the opponent. But today there are alot of jj practitioners fighting the same way (garry tonon for example). Other guys like andreas schmidt from germany emphasises control, and he progresses step by step, killing the space, till he get the submission. Both, Nicolas and Andreas, are highlevel LL Blackbelts (2nd and 4th degree) and both fight and teach in a completly different way. Therefore itīs safe to say that, like in jiu jitsu, there are many styles and ideas, the main thing that we differ nowadays to "nogi jiu jitsu" (more on that at the end) is the history, sometimes the catch wrestling mentality (elbow digging and crossfacing everyday) and the stronger emphasis on wrestling then most bjj schools.
But for me personaly there is JJ and there is Luta Livre. JJ is in the gi, LL is without. For me Nogi BJJ is obsurd in the same way GI Luta Livre would be obsurd to you. There is no GI Wrestling and no NOGI Judo.
I hope i could add something to the discussion
I had the pleasure to attend seminars and train with luta livre fighters like nicolas renier, leozada nogueira, pequeno, daniel d dane and andreas andyconda schmidt. And i must say that itīs sadly not black and white, and what i mean by that itīs hard to say that "luta livre emphasises submission before submission" or "luta livre emphasises top position". Like in bjj the styles differs from instructor to instructor. For example Nicolas Renier talks about "breaking the cycle", meaning that normaly there is a hirachy in position and a "natural" idea that you take the opponent down, pass the guard, get mount or backmount and then submit the opponent. Nicolas wants to attack from all positions to suprise the opponent. But today there are alot of jj practitioners fighting the same way (garry tonon for example). Other guys like andreas schmidt from germany emphasises control, and he progresses step by step, killing the space, till he get the submission. Both, Nicolas and Andreas, are highlevel LL Blackbelts (2nd and 4th degree) and both fight and teach in a completly different way. Therefore itīs safe to say that, like in jiu jitsu, there are many styles and ideas, the main thing that we differ nowadays to "nogi jiu jitsu" (more on that at the end) is the history, sometimes the catch wrestling mentality (elbow digging and crossfacing everyday) and the stronger emphasis on wrestling then most bjj schools.
But for me personaly there is JJ and there is Luta Livre. JJ is in the gi, LL is without. For me Nogi BJJ is obsurd in the same way GI Luta Livre would be obsurd to you. There is no GI Wrestling and no NOGI Judo.
I hope i could add something to the discussion
