The fallacy is that you assumed something that wasn't even there. Reading comprehension. I take it you don't like me (that's an assumption). I'm fine with that. But you should try actually reading what I write, not responding to whatever triggers you.
Besides mentioning TJ dillashaw, the only other time I mentioned wrestlers is when I mentioned how, out of all the dominant martial arts in MMA, BJJ seems to be the only one who hasn't really adapted itself to mixed martial arts. I get your point about purity, which is ironic, because bjj was designed as a self defense art but it has evolved into a sport. Granted, these days MMA isn't really a proving ground for individual martial arts, but I feel like BJJ should have enough pride to want to prove itself as relevant modern day martial art. Not a martial art that's easy to negate with a simple sprawl or willful disengaging.
Besides mentioning TJ dillashaw, the only other time I mentioned wrestlers is when I mentioned how, out of all the dominant martial arts in MMA, BJJ seems to be the only one who hasn't really adapted itself to mixed martial arts. I get your point about purity, which is ironic, because bjj was designed as a self defense art but it has evolved into a sport. Granted, these days MMA isn't really a proving ground for individual martial arts, but I feel like BJJ should have enough pride to want to prove itself as relevant modern day martial art. Not a martial art that's easy to negate with a simple sprawl or willful disengaging.