
Originally Posted by
Mike Nall
Do you mean Rafa has been subbed by Cobrinha twice? or that Cobrinha has been subbed twice? I know since brown belt he's only been tapped twice, only once at his weight, and it was an armbar from Rafa in the gi a few years ago. I agree with every word of your post except the last part. I think if you didn't look at any points in their ADCC 2013 match, and you just watched what happened, I think Rafa got out grappled in this match. I thought Cobrinha got 1 or 2 significant takedowns that didn't score, but clearly showed that the balance tipped in his favor. Even die hard Rafa fans in the chat during the match were saying that it would be shame if Cobrinha didn't get the nod. He worked hard for that win and he earned it.
Yeah, I meant that Cobrinha has only been tapped twice at Blackbelt (that I could find - only once that I'd seen), but I worded it strangely didn't I? I've gone back and edited it now
For anyone reading in hindsight: It was because I said they had over 150 matches collectively and across that they'd only been tapped twice (both taps belonging to Cobrinha). I guess that could be read in a number of ways!
Anyway, Mike, I'm glad you agree with so much of what I said.
About the last bit, I was talking about it in my 'sub only' mentality - i.e. none of them lost within the rules they were choosing not to win or lose by. They both decided the other would not score a point more than them and they both ensured that was the case. They gambled then on the other opponent making a mistake (which I have already commented on, and none of them did). I believe Cobrinha had Mendes closest to 'trouble' when he got him in a disgusting footlock (if I remember rightly), so I put that down to why Cobrinha won. That said Mendes evidently has Stretch Armstrong as a father, so perhaps he let Cobrinha have that one with the knowledge that his rubber ankles/knees wouldn't snap.
In all seriousness, it has been a while since I watched it (not the kind of match you watch too many times), so I should probably revisit it and check up on some of the points you made and possibly refresh my view