
Originally Posted by
Ben Eddy
I think it's a game plan a person could have for sure. You know you're giving up the money if you take that route though. And you take the risk of A: tiring yourself out (which I think somewhat happened to Soto by the time he got to the finals) and B: if you get subbed in any OT or before you lose. So I'm not sure it's all that great of a game plan or if it would pay off.
I don't think Soto really played that game though. His jits was pretty explosive and impressive as far as I saw. It was quite impressive to me to see an MMA guy have better back control than a Miyao brother. That's Miyao's game and Soto beat him at it. I wouldn't say that Miyao was going for subs in OT, he was just trying to control Soto and he couldn't.
If Miyao would have beat out Soto by being 15 seconds quicker, it's unlikely he would of tapped to Cummings leg locks as we have seen him with Tonon just not be subbed to legs. So then we see another OT and Miyao wins with a 0$ prize pool? Could have happened for sure and I still wouldn't argued Miyao tried to do that, it's just what happened and how his style matched up with the other guys.
But yes, I do think we will see some guys choose to just slow things down in OT if they get taken there. I don't think we will see many try to get there because of the money incentive, cardio etc. But if a match gets taken to OT then yes I think there will be guys who decide holding a person for more time is better than trying for a risky sub.
Maybe setting up a time limit for the first two OT rounds is a good idea to try and limit how much time OT can take up? Or make the first two rounds time not matter, then just the third round have it be time and sub? Then you have the first two rounds where you just want to try a submission and the last round where there is strategy.
I agree with this.
That's pretty much the only thing I could come up with. There seems to be risk when going for the submission in OT, as it can make it easier for the defensive person to escape and get a time advantage. Then in the next round that person (now offense) can further increase his time advantage through stalling, committing 100% to maintaining position and control.
What if the first 2 or 3 rounds had time limits and no escape time accumulation? This would take the risk of accumulative escape time off of the offensive person and because of the time limit, increase the urgency for submission. -Although this would mean the defensive person could try and stall till time ran out because escape would not be urgent.
Then if it got past these rounds it would go into one or two standard no time limit, timed escape rounds. And again the offensive person could stall, but at least for the first 2 or 3 rounds the person on offense would get to really go after the finish with out putting themselves at a disadvantage.