I like Zahabi. I also understand where he's coming from where faster isn't always better, but I think its still the best tie breaker possible that has yet been suggested that I'm aware of. I'm going to disagree big time about the judges though. I have competed at events like this MANY times and was even asked to judge once at one of these sub only with judges events, and there is a bunch of problems with them.
The obvious one is how subjective they are. They are basically a points tournament but with no one knowing what exactly the points are for (like the MMA system tons of people complain about)
But lets say the judges are just amazing.. The biggest problem that happens then, is ex: "Joe Smoe has passed your guard. Its early on in the match but thats the only relevant thing to happen so far. Joe know no matter the judge, how can you give it to a guy that got nothing done and was under side control the whole time? So Joe does not try to do anything else, that would be way to risky and he really wants to win. Joe holds you the whole time not even seriously trying anything else and wins."
Much respect to Zahabi, the guy is light years ahead of most others in the grappling community.