Eric Dubay is a NAZI sympathizer

Thread: Eric Dubay is a NAZI sympathizer

Tags: None
  1. Michael J Hewson said:
    A study led by Wolfgang Benz found that 5.29 to 6.20 jews were killed. Benz, Wolfgang (1996). Dimension des Völkermords. Die Zahl der jüdischen Opfer des Nationalsozialismus (in German). Dtv. ISBN 3-423-04690-2.

    Raul Hilberg and his book and study The Destruction of the European Jews found that at least 5.1 million jews were killed. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_De...1_million_Jews

    Lucy Dawidowicz used pre war census figured to find that 5.9 million jews were killed. Dawidowicz, Lucy (1975). The War against the Jews: 1933–1945. New York: Bantam.

    There is a few for you.

    Also the world almanac revised their numbers in 1949 and stated quite clearly that they are only estimates on the jewish population.

    So to be clear the World Almanac retracted their previous estimates and state that they were only estimates and were if fact in correct.

    #winning
     
  2. Michael J Hewson said:
     
  3. Craig Murray said:
    Quote Originally Posted by Michael J Hewson View Post
    A study led by Wolfgang Benz found that 5.29 to 6.20 jews were killed. Benz, Wolfgang (1996). Dimension des Völkermords. Die Zahl der jüdischen Opfer des Nationalsozialismus (in German). Dtv. ISBN 3-423-04690-2.

    Raul Hilberg and his book and study The Destruction of the European Jews found that at least 5.1 million jews were killed. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_De...1_million_Jews

    Lucy Dawidowicz used pre war census figured to find that 5.9 million jews were killed. Dawidowicz, Lucy (1975). The War against the Jews: 1933–1945. New York: Bantam.

    There is a few for you.

    Also the world almanac revised their numbers in 1949 and stated quite clearly that they are only estimates on the jewish population.

    So to be clear the World Almanac retracted their previous estimates and state that they were only estimates and were if fact in correct.

    #winning
    I wouldn't say winning but that's much more like what I was talking about! Now we need to look into those studies you cited and see what's really going on in them. Maybe they are right. Maybe you CAN incinerate 6 million people in that time. But let's dig in and see.
     
  4. Craig Murray said:
    The University of Alberta library has the World Almanac issues for the pertinent period for 1941, 1944, 1947, 1948, and 1949. The figures listed for total world Jewish population are as follows:

    1941 15,748,091
    1944 15,192,089
    1947 15,688,259
    1948 15,688,259
    1949 11,266,600

    Someone should find those publications and see if those numbers are correct. If they are, then the almanac vanishes as an argument that it's a hoax.

    It also means that if it IS a hoax, the almanac was in on it by the '49 publication. Very fast for the global conspiracy to "implant" that 6 million figure.

    Also does that number appear in the original publican, or a later re-publication of the old 49 edition. Publishing has revisions, and they change shit. You need to see an original 49 edition.

    That said, even that almanac estimate is 4 million, not 6.

    Makes me wonder though, how does the almanac do it's estimates?
    Last edited by Craig Murray; 03-29-2017 at 07:52 PM.
     
  5. Craig Murray said:
    Personally I don't really understand the whole argument in the first place. Does anyone deny that jews were rounded up and put in camps? The US did the same thing to American citizens of Japanese descent during the same war... rounded them up at gunpoint and put them in camps.

    Is that why we need to prove they gassed them? Because then the Nazis are worse than the Americans during the same period?
     
  6. Primalredemption said:
    6 million 6 million 6 million, You guys want to know why these "authorities" insist on the figure of 6 million? Do you realize the phrase "6 million Jews" being killed, persecuted or tortured was mentioned over 10 times between 1915 and 1938? Want to know why? It's because the Torah states that 6 million will have to die in ovens before the state of Israel can be formed:

    "Jewish prophecies in the Torah require that 6 million Jews must "vanish" before the state of Israel can be formed. "You shall return minus 6 million." That's why Tom Segev, an Israeli historian, declared that the "6 million" is an attempt to transform the Holocaust story into state religion. Those six million, according to prophecy, had to disappear in "burning ovens", which the judicial version of the Holocaust now authenticates. As a matter of fact, Robert B. Goldmann writes: ". . . without the Holocaust, there would be no Jewish State." A simple consequence: Given six million Jews gassed at Auschwitz who ended up in the "burning ovens" (the Greek word holocaust means burned offerings), therefore, the prophecies have now been "fulfilled" and Israel can become a "legitimate state".

    "Regarding the 'six million' number you should know the following: In the Hebrew text of the Torah prophesies, one can read "you shall return". In the text the letter "V" or "VAU" is absent, as Hebrew does not have any numbers; the letter V stands for the number 6. Ben Weintraub, a religious scientist, learned from rabbis that the meaning of the missing letter means the number is '6 million'. The prophesy then reads: You will return, but with 6 million less. See Ben Weintraub: "The Holocaust Dogma of Judaism", Cosmo Publishing, Washington 1995, page 3. The missing 6 million must be so before the Jews can return to the Promised Land. Jahweh sees this as a cleaning of the souls of the sinful people. The Jews must, on the return to the Promised Land, be clean -- the cleaning shall be done in burning stokes."

    Here are over 140 references to '6 Million Jews':

    http://balder.org/judea/Six-Million-...ials-Began.php

    Are you eyeballs starting to open?
     
  7. Primalredemption said:
     
  8. Michael J Hewson said:
    Cool image let me just zoom in here and read... oh would you look at that its illegible.

    Interesting that after all the solid evidence I have brought to the table, you bring an unreadable document.

    This is my last post here because you are 100% not serious if this is the sort of "evidence" you are going to bring to the table.
     
  9. Humanfit said:
    Quote Originally Posted by Michael J Hewson View Post

    This is my last post here because you are 100% not serious if this is the sort of "evidence" you are going to bring to the table.
    yeah I could undersatand, since your evidence was so much more profound...
     
  10. Humanfit said:
    I personally think it's a good call for you to stop trying too. You quoted Wikipedia twice. It's been a long couple days for you I'm sure...