
Originally Posted by
Humanfit
I'm just going to make a friendly suggestion. Just make your own thread about it.... Please... Pretty please?
Ehh I'm not sure why I'd need to- we can be on good terms and still debate these things. You seem friendly enough.
All I ask is that people who engage me show intellectual integrity, the way I did toward Murray when he said in the concave model the sun should be a little smaller in diameter when it's further away. I agree with that, and I myself am not fully satisfied with the magnification effect of the glass sky as a total solution.
Likewise, when someone like Jason goes out of his way to quote me in the context that he is refuting me, I expect him to accept when his refutation has been refuted. As I proved with side by side images, the bottom segment of objects at a distance are clipped off, either due to curvature of light bending or a combination- but if it were flat we would be able to see to the bottom of the platform.
There are hundreds of these zoom in videos that all show the same thing: objects at a distance have their bottom segment clipped off from view. The very videos made to disprove curvature are actually disproving flatness. We have to acknowledge the truth, regardless of our egos or identification with a belief.