Young earth documentary

[SebG]

Exactly my Point have you ever looked at both sides of the of the argument ? Or just what they taught you in school?
Big Bang
We evolved from nothing
we are here for no purpose

God
We were created by a living loving God
We were created with Purpose

I want people to look at both sides not just what they were taught in school
science is awesome but they mix in their agenda with is and try to say it proves things it dose not

example carbon 14 does not prove the age of a rock

Carbon 14 radio-isotope testing is not used to date rocks.

Big Bang theory does not claim something came out of nothing.

Evidence of a Big Bang or an Inflation does not disprove a loving God.

Evidence for evolution does not disprove a loving God.

The above simply disprove that the Bible is a science book. Is that what you think it is?

The impression I get is that you appear to claim that every single scientist and engineer in the world has an anti-God bias and *deliberately* develops false scientific theories as well as accurate ones. I don't want to misinterpret your debate but that is the impression I get.

[lattamoney]

Carbon 14 radio-isotope testing is not used to date rocks.

Big Bang theory does not claim something came out of nothing.

Evidence of a Big Bang or an Inflation does not disprove a loving God.

Evidence for evolution does not disprove a loving God.

The above simply disprove that the Bible is a science book. Is that what you think it is?

The impression I get is that you appear to claim that every single scientist and engineer in the world has an anti-God bias and *deliberately* develops false scientific theories as well as accurate ones. I don't want to misinterpret your debate but that is the impression I get.

There is no Evidence of the Big Bang
There is no Evidence of evolution

Most Scientist mix Factual science with and with a outlandish claim that cant be proved .
And yes most scientist do have anti God agendas

you can not believe in both

God Created us.
or we evolved from monkeys

[SebG]

There is no Evidence of the Big Bang
There is no Evidence of evolution

Most Scientist mix Factual science with and with a outlandish claim that cant be proved .
And yes most scientist do have anti God agendas

you can not believe in both

God Created us.
or we evolved from monkeys

I disagree that one cannot believe in both. It is clear that the Bible is not a science book. A few times you have misquoted science -

e.g. you claimed that Carbon-14 radio isotope methods are used to date rocks, which it is not.
Also, evolution doesn't claim that humans evolved from monkeys - instead the evidence appears to show that humans and monkeys both evolved from a common ancestor.

"God created us" could simply be an allegory - have you read "2001 A Space Odyssey"?

I am still not convinced that there is a conflict between scientific investigation and a Loving God as outlined in the Bible. You haven't stated any particular facts to "prove" the Bible truth and yet you claim that scientists make outlandish claims that can't be proved.

Science uses scientific method. That's how we have arrived at using computers and mobile phones every day and how we are even having this discussion. So the scientific method is agnostic.

[lattamoney]

i disagree that one cannot believe in both. It is clear that the bible is not a science book. A few times you have misquoted science -

e.g. You claimed that carbon-14 radio isotope methods are used to date rocks, which it is not.
Also, evolution doesn't claim that humans evolved from monkeys - instead the evidence appears to show that humans and monkeys both evolved from a common ancestor.

"god created us" could simply be an allegory - have you read "2001 a space odyssey"?

I am still not convinced that there is a conflict between scientific investigation and a loving god as outlined in the bible. You haven't stated any particular facts to "prove" the bible truth and yet you claim that scientists make outlandish claims that can't be proved.

Science uses scientific method. That's how we have arrived at using computers and mobile phones every day and how we are even having this discussion. So the scientific method is agnostic.

watch the documentary they poke holes in everything you just said

[CShahgholi]

Kent Hovind just uses the Presuppositional Argument. He never gets into proving his stance.

[SebG]

Kent Hovind just uses the Presuppositional Argument. He never gets into proving his stance.

LOL.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presup...al_apologetics

Could have saved a lot of time if I'd known that from the start. I imagine there are a lot of problems with that approach, one simply being interpretation of Bible passages - when to take it literally, when to "interpret". I know a person who is convinced that the physics of the universe changed after "Noah's flood" and that there were no rainbows before then.