It'll be hard to find fact or physical evidence on here Angel as most of us are not agricultural engineers or food tasters. Let's take it down to a molecular level and we'll use the example of synthetically produced vitamin C vs naturally occurring vitamin C. On a molecular level, they're the EXACT same molecule and the body processes, and uses them the exact same. The only difference is with synthetic vitamin C, it's standardized as far as concentration and can usually hold a lot longer vs natural sources, *ie oranges, lemons, limes.* Just because something is synthetic, does not mean it's not AS GOOD if not better than naturally occurring sources. I'm not arguing for, or against organic by the way, just giving counterpoints based on logic and reason vs personal opinion, bias, etc. Let the scientific method help your judgement. What's funny to me is, even with all our advancements in science and technology, a large part of the population still thinks personal testimonial = scientific fact. The beauty with the scientific method vs other systems of belief is that science is always trying to prove itself WRONG in order to advance. Its crowning jewel of it all is the double blind, placebo controlled study.
What does this mean as far as organic vs non-organic? All it means that if we really wanted the truth, we could test it to see if there is any real, cost effective benefit for going with one or the other by measuring different elements like varying efficacy, taste, vitamin concentration, etc.
What does this mean as far as organic vs non-organic? All it means that if we really wanted the truth, we could test it to see if there is any real, cost effective benefit for going with one or the other by measuring different elements like varying efficacy, taste, vitamin concentration, etc.