I'm sure this topic has been brought up in a thread before.....many times...especially about size. I know it usually comes down to flexibity, repetition, talent, etc. but I was hoping to get opinions on how people perceive being skinny and maybe a little bit muscular compared to someone who is shredded and big when doing jiu jitsu. It seems to me that people who are skinnier or slim like eddie bravo and don't have much muscle mass have better technique and it's easier for flexibility. Do any of you find an advantage to being really muscular besides having a good base for wrestling and muscling/powerhousing moves on people? and i'm mainly talking about flexibility, guard and technique. are there many people who are muscular that don't always wind up on top and have a sick game like rousimar palhares?? he is one of the only ones to me that looks like a gorilla and just has sick technique. i could note people that are names and fighters like werdum and palahares like i did but was wondering if anyone on the forum has any insight (those guys are fighters too i'm speaking soley for jitsu). I feel i'm pretty muscular and focus on lifting weights and cardio to get big but stay in condition a lot but was wondering if it would be more of an advantage for technique to just be slim to help with flexibility, stretching and obviously endurance would come into play...you know having that "runners" type of body to have a great jiu jitsu game for amplified techniques. thoughts? has anyone ever transitioned from being skinny doing jiu jitsu to/from being muscular (still in shape) and noticed a difference in how they compete/practice?