Ok if you go back far enough in history, of course you will eventually find something that wouldn't apply with today's laws. This specific case is recent and if you bothered to read the facts on the case you would see that those hippies were wrong. Yes we have the first amendment; however, we all know there will always be limitations to that. In black and white, here are the regulations for the National Capital Region:
"[d]emonstrations and special events may be held only pursuant to a permit . . . .” 36 C.F.R. § 7.96(g)(2). “Demonstrations” include: picketing, speechmaking, marching, holding vigils or religious services and all other like forms of conduct which involve the communication or expression of views or grievances, engaged in by one or more persons, the conduct of which has the effect, intent or propensity to draw a crowd or onlookers. [The] term does not include casual park use by visitors or tourists which does not have an intent or propensity to attract a crowd or onlookers."
Regardless of opinion or what you feel; this is the law and it has to be enforced. It's simple to anybody with an unbiased look at things and a little common sense.
"[d]emonstrations and special events may be held only pursuant to a permit . . . .” 36 C.F.R. § 7.96(g)(2). “Demonstrations” include: picketing, speechmaking, marching, holding vigils or religious services and all other like forms of conduct which involve the communication or expression of views or grievances, engaged in by one or more persons, the conduct of which has the effect, intent or propensity to draw a crowd or onlookers. [The] term does not include casual park use by visitors or tourists which does not have an intent or propensity to attract a crowd or onlookers."
Regardless of opinion or what you feel; this is the law and it has to be enforced. It's simple to anybody with an unbiased look at things and a little common sense.