
Originally Posted by
Laura Caffy
Can I just take Royler's side for fun. Isn't Eddie constantly claiming he's trying to create a style that is mainly focused on MMA, so why doesn't he prove that his style is superior on a horrible striker. Also, which would you take, a match for 100k or a pride match, is he being a good business man by leaving his ego at the door?
ego has nothing to do with it man. imagine you played basketball all your life, and you once beet a fantastic guy at a game of one on one, it was a great feat.but its like instead of him facing you again at one on one basketball to get even, he dick tucks, then challenges you to play american football. when youve never even played in your life, and hes been in some good teams a while back. not to mention the risk of injury is significantly higher etc it would be a completely unfair challenge. accepting it would be stupid.