as far as standups in mma are concerned, the referee should be held responsible for knowing the fighters and having done his homework coming into the fight.
if you see a 10th planet guy on the ground working his rubber guard, you can make a rather safe assumption that he is in an advantageous position; one that he TRAINED TO BE IN. that's key. he is in control of the ring, which is one of the major criteria for scoring the fight. in Jouban's case, he is also controlling the pace and the striking (albeit from the ground, which is not a traditional striking position).
if a referee can allow strikers to dictate when a grappler has to standup (see Werdum v Overeem), the grappler should be afforded the same luxury when he does achieve position on the ground. otherwise, we allow the sport to trend towards a striking bias. i understand that is what the average, non-training fan wants to see; it is not, however, an accurate depiction of one-on-one, unarmed combat. quick standups and a push from the referees for "action" force one to come to the same conclusions that Rickson states in his most recent interview.
referees need to know the fighters and what their preferred mode of operation is. it would remedy many of the referee standup dilemmas.