
Originally Posted by
David Stager
As a Jone's hater, I've often asked myself what exactly it is about him that makes me hate him (I'm also using the term hate loosely here). I think it's because of his body type. Really. It doesn't seem fair that he's got such long arms and legs. On the one hand, he's exploiting his natural advantages, but on the other hand, who else can shoot for a takedown as far out as he does successfully? And who but Jon Jones wouldn't whiff with those spinning back elbows? The guy is freakishly long-limbed, and I hate him for it.
I guess it's the same reason people hated Brock when he came on the scene and started using his size and strength to bully people. But eventually people figured out how to beat him. It's not Jones' fault that he's built that way and uses it to his advantage. For a long time Sherk had an "unfair" advantage of being so short because it was damn near impossible to take him down, but he had no problem taking everyone else down. Mike Tyson's short arms made his hooks vicious. Klitschko brothers use their reach to jab their way to decisions. A lot of guys have physical advantages that they use in their favor. It's not fair to hate them for it.
And to be honest, Anderson has had a similar advantage by being taller and having a longer reach. GSP for a long time out sized a lot of his opponents. And on the opposite side you have Stefan Struve who, despite his reach advantage, still loses to better fighters.
Not trying to convert you. Just saying, size advantage isn't a good reason to "hate" on the kid. His size isn't what gives him wins. It's how he uses that size and applies technique. I think he deserves a little more credit than "he's just long."
I'm going to start a Jones hate thread.