To Mr Landry's point, the story of the bouncer and RNC to me perfectly illustrates my argument and even the principle difference between the Helio-descendant way of thinking and 10P. The Helio, or his sons answer to the same situation, "Why isn't the technique working?" (the RNC on the massive bouncer) would be "The move was not done at the right time" they would go on to explain that every technique, even the RNC has loopholes to be exploited and that a opponent, especially larger and stronger would need to be sufficiently exhausted before a smaller person (like Eddie) has a chance of completing the submission. The 10P answer to the situation is, do reps over and over to develops strength until your "squeeze" is sufficient to complete the move on the desired opponent. If Helio or his direct lineage were to be in the same situation, it's unlikely they would have tried to RNC a fully rested, massive opponent who EXPECTS the RNC. GJJ practicioner's would opt to have the bouncer attempt to beat or submit them, at the point of exhaustion, possibly apply a submission or escape, 10P does not follow that same old-school philosophy. It's also unfair to liken the bouncer-RNC story to a woman's self defense. No woman is going to hop on the back of a massive bouncer and try to apply a submission the assailant KNOWS is coming. A woman's self defense system needs to be based on ability to survive and escape without exhausting, not on building the required attributes to mount an offensive.