In terms of bias, the reporter is bringing way too many of his own opinions into the interview. That only works when it's a "conversation" with John Danaher and not an "interview" with John Danaher. And, if we don't know who you are and you have no credibility -as is the case with the reporter, then we don't care what your opinion is. This is typical of the You Tube "I bought a camera so now I am a reporter" mentality that is prevalent these days...