Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345
Results 41 to 50 of 50

Thread: New world order

  1. #41

    Array

    School
    SIMS / 10th Planet Omaha
    Location
    Bellevue, Nebraska
    Posts
    99
    This mattered a lot more back when the Colonies had no standing army, and only militia.
    Are you going to use your military style assault weapons to fight the US military? Not neccessary for self-defense. Not even close.

  2. #42

    Array

    School
    SIMS / 10th Planet Omaha
    Location
    Bellevue, Nebraska
    Posts
    99
    Quote Originally Posted by Nathan Kelso View Post
    "What is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them."
    - George Mason, father of the Bill of Rights

    "The right of a citizen to keep and bear arms has justly been considered the palladium of the liberties of the republic, since it offers a strong moral check against the usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers, and will generally, even if these are successful in the first instance, enable the people to resist and triumph over them."
    - Joseph Story, 1833, U.S. Supreme Court Justice


    Re-examine your definition of self defense.
    My last post was in response to this post.

  3. #43

    Array

    School
    Lake Effect jiu jitsu
    Location
    Marquette MI
    Posts
    1,103
    Yes, a day may come when we may need to take up arms against an unjust tyranical US government. It hopefully will be a weaker version of what we have now as deserters flee to fight for their families. the remaining military will be mostly power hungry ,corrupt, bullies brainwashed by a tyranical leader. They will have civillians and former military out gunned. You think that could never happen? I'm sure the North never thought the South would ever split from the union and take up arms against the US government. There is a hint of truth to the old saying "history has a way of repeating itself!!"

  4. #44

    Array

    School
    Formerly 10P Spokane
    Posts
    100
    Quote Originally Posted by Dwight Roux View Post
    Obama is not really in charge, his handlers (Bankers) have him in check. So it doesnt really matter if he is in office again or not. The next president be it Republican or democrat will be bought and paid for, and kept in check as well.
    You're absolutely right, but we must also realize that no puppet is merely a puppet. The controllers agree on much, but there are most definitely internal power struggles and multiple layers of tactical negotiation. Vast webs of contrasting agendas that intertwine and diverge at random. Does Obama recieve orders? Yes. But does his leash also receive a modicum of slack to persue his personal brand of National Socialism in return for obedience? Yes. Same as Bush, Clinton, and every other Commander in Thief.

  5. #45

    Array

    School
    Formerly 10P Spokane
    Posts
    100
    Quote Originally Posted by Matt Hester View Post
    This mattered a lot more back when the Colonies had no standing army, and only militia.
    Are you going to use your military style assault weapons to fight the US military? Not neccessary for self-defense. Not even close.
    Please review the history of guerilla warfare.

    Also, recognize these two factors:

    1. Many U.S. soldiers would resent the order to kill their fathers.

    2. Each casualty equals a whole group of family and friends who will now resist if they haven't began to already. (See: Iraq and Afghanistan)

  6. #46

    Array

    School
    Formerly 10P Spokane
    Posts
    100
    I'll take the time now to share a topic some here might not have known about.

    The Georgia Guidestones, known as the American Stonehenge. A mysterious monument upon which ten new commandments for an "Age of Reason" are inscribed in ten languages. The following article elucidates. It's well worth the read for anyone who might be new to the stones.

    http://vigilantcitizen.com/sinisters...a-guidestones/

  7. #47

    Array

    School
    Formerly 10P Spokane
    Posts
    100
    The following is a small collection of quotes from the book "Ecoscience" published in 1978. A co-author, John Holdren, was appointed by President Obama as Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, Assistant to the President for Science and Technology, and Co-Chair of the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology.

    ***

    "Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society." - Pg. 837

    "One way to carry out this disapproval might be to insist that all illegitimate babies be put up for adoption—especially those born to minors, who generally are not capable of caring properly for a child alone. If a single mother really wished to keep her baby, she might be obliged to go through adoption proceedings and demonstrate her ability to support and care for it. Adoption proceedings probably should remain more difficult for single people than for married couples, in recognition of the relative difficulty of raising children alone. It would even be possible to require pregnant single women to marry or have abortions, perhaps as an alternative to placement for adoption, depending on the society." - Pg. 786

    "Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods is a suggestion that seems to horrify people more than most proposals for involuntary fertility control. Indeed, this would pose some very difficult political, legal, and social questions, to say nothing of the technical problems. No such sterilant exists today, nor does one appear to be under development. To be acceptable, such a substance would have to meet some rather stiff requirements: it must be uniformly effective, despite widely varying doses received by individuals, and despite varying degrees of fertility and sensitivity among individuals; it must be free of dangerous or unpleasant side effects; and it must have no effect on members of the opposite sex, children, old people, pets, or livestock." - Pg. 787-8

    "Involuntary fertility control
    ...
    A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be easier to implement than trying to sterilize men.
    ...
    The development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired opens additional possibilities for coercive fertility control. The capsule could be implanted at puberty and might be removable, with official permission, for a limited number of births." - Pg. 786-7

    "Toward a Planetary Regime
    ...
    Perhaps those agencies, combined with UNEP and the United Nations population agencies, might eventually be developed into a Planetary Regime—sort of an international superagency for population, resources, and environment. Such a comprehensive Planetary Regime could control the development, administration, conservation, and distribution of all natural resources, renewable or nonrenewable, at least insofar as international implications exist. Thus the Regime could have the power to control pollution not only in the atmosphere and oceans, but also in such freshwater bodies as rivers and lakes that cross international boundaries or that discharge into the oceans. The Regime might also be a logical central agency for regulating all international trade, perhaps including assistance from DCs to LDCs, and including all food on the international market.

    The Planetary Regime might be given responsibility for determining the optimum population for the world and for each region and for arbitrating various countries' shares within their regional limits. Control of population size might remain the responsibility of each government, but the Regime would have some power to enforce the agreed limits." - Pg. 942-3

    "If this could be accomplished, security might be provided by an armed international organization, a global analogue of a police force. Many people have recognized this as a goal, but the way to reach it remains obscure in a world where factionalism seems, if anything, to be increasing. The first step necessarily involves partial surrender of sovereignty to an international organization." - Pg. 917

    ***

    I will reiterate.

    John Holdren was appointed by President Obama as Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, Assistant to the President for Science and Technology, and Co-Chair of the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology.

  8. #48
    Quote Originally Posted by Kurzy View Post
    It is well known that he was not only the founder of the illuminati, but also the head behind the infiltration of the masons, morphing them from an "architectural apprenticeship organization" into what is now known as the "Free" masons, which is now a vehicle for the global dissemination of revolutionary anarchistic ideology.
    Wow. THey must put something in the ice cream then to get all those old guys wound up then. You can go to a meeting if you like, they have a day when they can bring friends with them. It isn't as nefarious as you make it out to be. Maybe its the ice cream manufacturers. Ben & jerry's founder has some different ideas.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/1...n_1932499.html

  9. #49

    Array

    School
    none
    Location
    Stephens City VA
    Posts
    53
    those holdren book quotes are eye openers. thanks for those

  10. #50

    Array

    School
    Formerly 10P Spokane
    Posts
    100
    The curious case of Svali.

    Former Illuminati programmer speaks out.

    http://svalispeaks.com/

    Interview:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H9YBPwDBBpc

Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •