Originally Posted by
Craig Murray
Here's a good one.... explain lunar eclipse in a concave earth. The earth blocks out the sun and casts the moon in shadow. Seems impossible in concave Earth.
The moon covers the sun...Round Earth makes sense with everything I observe. The other theories don't. It's pretty simple.
No offense Craig, but you haven't researched this subject nearly as much as I have. It's not that concave Earth doesn't make sense. It's that you aren't aware of the impossibilities of the Globe model nor the workings of the concave model. Which is fine, but you have to approach this topic understanding that I know everything you know and then some about the conventional earth model,
as well as Flat and concave theories.
This is a prime example. The Lunar eclipse has in fact been documented by the Royal Astronomical Society to take place while the Sun and Moon are
both visible in the sky at the
same time. Now think about this for just one second. If the Sun and Moon are both in the sky at the same time, how can the Earth's shadow possibly be the cause of the Lunar eclipse? It can't.
Concave Earth's model is the
only one that supplies a solution to this phenomenon. The Sunlight travels and bends around the central celestial sphere The moon is simply in a dark zone where the Sun's light isn't shining. Simple is it not?
And so you can see with this model its possible for the Moon to still be in a dark zone while the sun is visible in the sky as well.
This also explains the anti-solar illumination we observe-
gegenshein. Of course you don't know what that is either. There is actually a spot of light in the night sky exactly opposite from where the sun is on the other side of earth.
I also think my explanation for gravity is superior to Newtons. Newton himself admitted that the tidal bulges on Earth don't match what we would expect from an orbiting moon with its own gravity. Refer back to the first page for the illustration of Gravity.
Bookmarks