New photos of Pentagon attack...still no plane!?!?!?!?

[Ric]

As I person who believes the Earth is round and that Lee Harvy Oswald acted alone in killing JFK, I'm the last person to see a conspiracy in the events of 9/11. But....I gotta admit I find it really odd that the FBI releases new photos of the Pentagon attack and I STILL can't see an airplane anywhere.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/fbi-...lide=1.3014494

[Jason Mallory]

As I person who believes the Earth is round and that Lee Harvy Oswald acted alone in killing JFK, I'm the last person to see a conspiracy in the events of 9/11. But....I gotta admit I find it really odd that the FBI releases new photos of the Pentagon attack and I STILL can't see an airplane anywhere.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/fbi-...lide=1.3014494

There was no plane... sorry.

[Brandon Mccaghren]

I saw at least 3 pictures in that photo set with clear and obvious pieces of the plane.

[Craig Murray]

I saw at least 3 pictures in that photo set with clear and obvious pieces of the plane.

some really close up shots of one or two pieces of a plane is not the MASSIVE devastation and wreckage you would see from a downed airliner.

How many of the 150 bodies did you see smoldering? How many chairs did you see? Suitcases? I see nothing even closely resembling a plane wreckage site.

[Chris Garry]

Did this really need 2 separate threads?

[Ric]

There was no plane... sorry.

I honestly tried to watch this video today. Seriously. I was working on the computer and I let it play in the background. But after more than an hour I still don't understand their central point. It's endless "proof" that the plane didn't take the South approach (or the North approach, I really can't even remember already), but I don't understand the significance of either. And the narrator talks so slowly and the information is so repetitive that I just didn't get anything significant from the hour plus I spent on this video.

[Jason Mallory]

I honestly tried to watch this video today. Seriously. I was working on the computer and I let it play in the background. But after more than an hour I still don't understand their central point. It's endless "proof" that the plane didn't take the South approach (or the North approach, I really can't even remember already), but I don't understand the significance of either. And the narrator talks so slowly and the information is so repetitive that I just didn't get anything significant from the hour plus I spent on this video.

I didn't get it at first either. First... I would say watch the video when you have time to focus on the information covered without distractions. As far as the info covered... the flight pattern of the supposed plain is physically impossible. On top of that there was no damage to the foundations of the Pentagon, which is where the 'plane' must have hit because the top of the Pentagon was intact when photos were first taken (the top collapsed in time).

The eyewitness testimony also adds to the fact that the plane that was seen did not hit the Pentagon but flew by. There is no plane in any of the pictures of the wreckage that have been released, before or after impact.

[Eddie Bravo]

Tremendous eveidence JFK and 911 were inside jobs. All you gotta do is get into a detective mind set and not a criminal defense attorney mind set.

[Humanfit]

Sorry, If your looking for the "plane" it's in the flat earth thread haha had to.

[Brandon Mccaghren]

Tremendous eveidence JFK and 911 were inside jobs. All you gotta do is get into a detective mind set and not a criminal defense attorney mind set.

I actually believe both of those events were inside jobs. I'm just not understanding the whole "there was no plane at the Pentagon" thing.