Originally Posted by
AndyK5
Maybe he is a man and if at all possible he would not pull out of a fight, unlike morally useless Jones who would get an F rating on being a man?
Hey guys, if all my speculation and assumptions are true, then that makes Jones less of a man than me, and Henderson chuck norris 2.0!
What if's, should not lead you into conclusions.
You wanna get upset about people assuming Hendo was being irresponsible without knowing all the facts about his injury, then fine, have at it.
But don't in the same post make an assumption about him being amazing, and then act like it's fact whilst shit talking Jones.
It makes you EXACTLY like those people going after Henderson for not revealing his injury sooner.
Should Henderson of disclosed his injury sooner?
Yes.
Should Jones of taken the fight with Chael?
If he saw fit to.
Should Machida or Shogun taken the fight with Jones?
If they saw fit to.
Should Dana have canceled an entire card because of one fight in it falling through?
No.
Because it shows that he had made a thin card with nothing of value on it, aside from the main event.
Fights we shell out cash for, need to have 2 main even fights, so that the UFC has something to fall back on if one falls through.
Dan should of been more honest with his injury, but at the same time he isn't responsible for anyone but himself, as is Jones, and Dana canceled that card on his own whim.
He's got all the die hard UFC fans convinced that Jones is solely to blame for it, and throwing all the blame away from himself.
He's been bitching about online streaming for so long, so these thin cards are his way of saying "hey, if you don't pay for my shit, the big names aren't going to fight as often" and all it does is damage the careers of the undercard fighters.
And of course, none of them want to openly speak against Dana, because he can change 3 bad fights in a row to two, or even one, and cut them loose.
Bookmarks