Originally Posted by
Joseph
Is that first part a direct quote or are you being hypothetical?
Direct quote per Eddie's explanation further back in the thread. The second half is my assumption of how the rest transpired. But the first part is true.
Gi pants were not part of the contract so it was like a verbal thing. The understanding that pants grabbing was part of the deal was never discussed. This is a fact.
Eddie changed his mind. This is a fact.
From what I understand he changed his mind on a whim. Maybe just to avoid the possibility of a quick pants grab that the ref may ignore. This is my theory.
Royler called his lawyer. This is a fact.
Bookmarks