They are not private lessons, it's a group of people paying to be evaluated to see if they can get their blue belt. We have to know 2 of almost everything like passing the guard, submissions from guard ect and its gotta be crisp. But there is a "seminar" before whatever that means. To me a private lesson is one on one and that's not it if that's what your thinking.
I totally get what your saying that its about learning but after 3 years and 2 months (with 1 month because I moved back to quebec and didnt have a job + 1yr and a half break because of dislocated elbow elbow was still hurting until a year has passed, i thought JJ was done for me than I said fuck it, im going back to JJ since it was in Judo (for 3 month) where i got a dislocated elbow.
As for why don't I only pay for the grading? because its both the seminar and grading or nothing, you can't just go to one of them and pay less or whatever.
Originally Posted by
NameLikeNoOther
I can see paying a coach for a private lesson to evaluate your abilities and provide advice on how to improve, but not just to 'get a belt'. In my opinion you should learn as much as you can from a coach, who really cares about the belt it is what you can do in the ring, mats, cage, street that really matters. In my opinion the belt is more a symbol of the relationship, commitment and years of service to your club or coach you learn from. Russian boxing coach says there are really only two ranks: you can fight or you can not fight. I just worry about learning new techniques and constant improvement.
Why don't you take his seminar and skip the grading if you can't afford to both?
Bookmarks