Hitler went to Argentina. Source: FBI

[Ross Davidson]

However, the DNA evidence does prove that they recovered the wrong bodies, so there's that too.

[Aaron Gustaveson]

Lol I was asking you if you read past page 4, as you suggested that I didn't even read to. This is an aggregation of documents, everything I mentioned is in there at different points.

You were asking if I read past page 4 by saying, "Did you read page 93?"? That is a really weird way to ask that! I dont think anyone would understand thats what you meant.

I did not in any way suggest that you hadn't read past page 4. Didn't imply it or insinuate it. I simply didn't assume you read every single page, I certainly didn't.

So if everything you mentioned is in there you can now get to answering my question, right? What supports your statements,
"the FBI believed it enough to spend a lot of time and effort gathering intelligence on Hitler's whereabouts after 'dying'" AND "numerous reports which lead the FBI to believe that Hitler is indeed in south america"

Its not my job to dig for info to support your claims.

[Aaron Gustaveson]

I lived in Germany for 3 years and it's a pretty common theory that Hitler escaped and made his way to South America. What's almost 100 percent agreed is that he did not die that day nor did he commit suicide.

Where I live its a pretty common theory that a extant undescribed hominid inhabits the woods.

[Aaron Gustaveson]

I think what's interesting is when people dismiss an intelligence agency's intelligence reports. How do you think they conduct business? Most of it is, well, was, seeing as how long ago this was, and how much technology has advanced, through word of mouth. Their sources had to be very credible to have interagency communications, communications between special agents and the head and founder of the FBI, as well as inter governmental communications, about the subject of Adolph fucking Hitler's whereabouts.

Why would you assume that their source had to be considered credible for inter bureau communications to take place? From what I have heard, heads of organizations like the FBI get tons of brief everday, far more than they can read.

[Aaron Gustaveson]

These files were released recently, like this year recently, Drew.

Yes but that does not negate anything that drew said.

[Jon Watkins]

Why would you assume that their source had to be considered credible for inter bureau communications to take place? From what I have heard, heads of organizations like the FBI get tons of brief everday, far more than they can read.

+1 Philip K. Dick had an FBI file that was basically him writing to the FBI asking for his FBI file. This is probably in the vault somewhere too.

[Joachim Hoff]

I saw this docu were they got to investigate Hitlers skull, (Russians had been sitting on it)
The dental records matched.
However, that was hidden away for a loooong time, so who knows. Maybe he did escape, but they got to him sometime afterwards.

A lot of Nazis did escape to Argentina tho. I don't know.

[Drew Ash]

These files were released recently, like this year recently, Drew.

Mhm.. but they werent hiding the fact that they received reports. You're just now getting to read said reports.
People make all kinds of claims and report it to the authorities. It proves nothing. Anecdotal evidence such as dna being female and personal experience(or hearsay) doesnt hold up as proof. Like I said.. we were aware reports existed.. now they release reports. Nothing changed other than they decided to let the public view the reports that we already knew existed.
Critical thinking is important kids.

[Ross Davidson]

Well I dunno where you were hearing about it Drew, cause this is the first I have ever in my life heard about the FBI acknowledging that Hitler may have escaped Germany.

Also, none of what you say disproves that he didn't escape. In fact, much of the evidence points to him at least not dying in Berlin.

Government agencies are renown for how they don't play nicely with each other unless there is something really credible. For the military to communicate with an agency within the department of justice, something serious needs to happen.

And Aaron, your condescension is noted. It's also not my job to present evidence for your argument. If you wish to debate, dig and get the info for yourself.

[Aaron Gustaveson]

They acknowledge the possibility? Like more than they acknowledge the possibility of the jersey devil or any crazy shit they had to take reports on?

There is no non-condescending sounding way to have to point out to someone that they have to provide evidence for their claims. You're patronization is noted. Dont assume my tone friend, like I said in the pm I sent you before you made this post, I dont hate ya.

I didnt ask you to provide evidence for "my argument". I dont have an argument. You are the one making a claim. You have to provide evidence. I dont wish to debate, this is not a debate, its a discussion where you are making a claim and others are asking for evidence. I haven't seen a counterclaim made by anyone. Im sure that sounds just as condescending but theres nothing I can do. If someone wants to rewrite it in a way that sounds better, I'd be interested to see it so I can write more like that