I don't think you're familiar with what happened. I'll post some sources so you can check the evidence yourself.
The 1989 victim in the gang rape case testified that Lloyd Irvin raped her while another man named Gatling was orally sodomizing her. Lloyd Irvin used the defense that he wanted to have sex with her, but that he was impotent. The jury did not convict him, because they weren't sure that the victim could be sure Lloyd penetrated her since the room was so dark and her vision was impaired from the oral sodomy. Everyone else that was charged was sent to prison, although there were likely several other men that participated that were never charged, the victim said it was 7-10 men, and I believe 5 went to prison. Even if Lloyd did not rape her, he himself testified that he would have had he been able to get erect. This brings us to Ryan Hall's point about a person convicted of attempted 1st degree murder is no better than someone convicted, the only difference is that the gun jammed.
For those that would imply that that it was consensual group sex, well, the physician thought differently, as did 4 separate juries that looked at the case. The woman was threatened to be thrown off the balcony, and she had bruises on her face and a busted lip from being punched.
This might not have even been discovered, but the day after the arrests Lloyd uploaded all these old rape prevention seminar testimonials. People thought it was to profit off of the tragedy on New Year's Eve. it was worse. He was trying to manipulate the Google rankings with SEO so that people would not find his old case.
Check out http://www.lloydirvinrapeexposed.com/
Also here are some old articles.
http://articles.dailypress.com/1990-...rape-case-girl
http://articles.dailypress.com/1991-...arrant-charged
http://articles.dailypress.com/1990-...en-young-woman
http://articles.dailypress.com/1990-...e-case-two-men
http://articles.dailypress.com/1991-...ton-university
http://articles.dailypress.com/1991-...orm-room-trial